Hallo,
Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
> I haven't tried this (and can't on this computer), but it occurred to
> me you may want to see what happens if you put the [pipe 0] directly
> after the [loadbang] (before the trigger). [pipe] and [delay] should
> always make a break in logic
e desire this behavior? It just seems obscure that
> loadbang would bang but disable (non-[pipe]ed) outlets.
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
> --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Matt Barber wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Barber
>> Subject: Re: [PD] Creation Argument Weirdness
>> To: pd-list@iem
would bang but disable (non-[pipe]ed) outlets.
-Jonathan
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Matt Barber wrote:
> From: Matt Barber
> Subject: Re: [PD] Creation Argument Weirdness
> To: pd-list@iem.at, "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 4:34 AM
> >
> > Hi,
&g
>
> Hi,
> I think I may have found a bug. After changing the abstraction
> argument, nothing comes out of the outlet to the parent patch. I'm on
> windows; can someone confirm before I post it on the bug tracker?
Same over here. As a very limited hack, you can throw a [pipe 0] in,
but dataflow
yeah weird. same thing here.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
I think I may have found a bug. After changing the abstraction
argument, nothing comes out of the outlet to the parent patch. I'm on
windows; can someone confirm before I post it on the bug tracker?
Thanks,
Jonathan
patch.pd
Description: application/puredata
abstraction.pd
Descri
