It's possible and would be an appropriate project, I think.
.hc
On Feb 20, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
I don't know if this is something worthy for the summer of code...
or at
all... but I would love PDP to work on Windows
___
Okay, so if I understand this right, there would the be an alternative:
Instead of fixing PDP, it would be good to have a [packet_forth]
object for PD that is cross-platform and lets you run the Packet Forth
scripts, correct?
Or is Packet Forth too far away from working???
~David
On 2/27/07,
hello all,
I don't know if this is something worthy for the summer of code... or at
all... but I would love PDP to work on Windows
i don't think that PDP will be on windows ever. tom is working on a new
project called pf (packet forth).
http://zwizwa.goto10.org/zwikizwaki.php?page=PacketForth
patrick wrote:
hello all,
I don't know if this is something worthy for the summer of code... or at
all... but I would love PDP to work on Windows
i don't think that PDP will be on windows ever. tom is working on a new
project called pf (packet forth).
well, this doesn't mean that pdp
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:39:03PM -0500, patrick wrote:
hi chris,
Heck yes, I 2nd both of these. Each time I want to interface
ARToolKitPlus with gem I have to write a weird abstraction layer using
network sockets to communicate. Would be great to have it straight in
there.
i would love
