Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-13 Thread Bernardo Barros
It was very hard to me to build pd-extended on Fedora 13 x86_64. I remember I had to tweak something, I can check it later if you want. I think the scripts are not tested on Fedora at all... And there is no package for 64bit :-( On Arch is was kind of easy, there is a AUR on ArchAudio. http://archa

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-13 Thread Pierre Massat
I'm giving up. I'll wait until i get time to install another distro. Thanks anyway! Pierre 2010/11/13 Hans-Christoph Steiner > > The header and the lib are the key part. So something like dssi.h and > maybe libdssi.so. > > .hc > > On Nov 12, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Pierre Massat wrote: > > dssi-deve

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-12 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
The header and the lib are the key part. So something like dssi.h and maybe libdssi.so. .hc On Nov 12, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Pierre Massat wrote: dssi-devel is in /usr/share/doc. Is this what you were talking about? Pierre 2010/11/12 Hans-Christoph Steiner You are missing dependencies for

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-12 Thread Pierre Massat
dssi-devel is in /usr/share/doc. Is this what you were talking about? Pierre 2010/11/12 Hans-Christoph Steiner > > You are missing dependencies for pidip. Try scrolling up and looking at > the ./configure output. > > As for dssi, the headers might be put in a different place in Fedora than > i

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-12 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
You are missing dependencies for pidip. Try scrolling up and looking at the ./configure output. As for dssi, the headers might be put in a different place in Fedora than in Debian. That would be good to figure out. .hc On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:18 AM, Pierre Massat wrote: I've tried agai

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-12 Thread Pierre Massat
I've tried again today. I'm still getting errors. I removed postlude from LIB_TARGETS, but it's surprizing that I get errors with dssi, because there is a dssi devel package for fedora and i installed it. Here are the errors: /home/pierre/Desktop/Pd-0.42.5-extended/packages/linux_make/build//usr

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-11 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Looks like you're missing the dssi devel package, if there is one for Fedora. Otherwise, you can remove 'postlude' from the build in the LIB_TARGETS section of externals/Makefile. .hc On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Pierre Massat wrote: Hi, I've been trying to build 0.42.5 on Fedora 12/Plan

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-11 Thread Pierre Massat
Hi, I've been trying to build 0.42.5 on Fedora 12/PlanetCCRMA. I have installed all the devel tools that were listed on the pd info page, and I have downloaded the source from the downloads page. It built for a moment and then i got some errors (many! see end of message). The build kind of works, a

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-08 Thread Pierre Massat
Sweet! thanks! 2010/11/8 Jeff Sandys > PlanetCCRMA is available for fedora 13: > > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/planetccrma/13/i386/repoview/ > > They need to update their web page pointing to the repositories. > > I built 42.4 in fedora 13, once planetCCRMA is in pl

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-08 Thread Jeff Sandys
PlanetCCRMA is available for fedora 13: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/planetccrma/13/i386/repoview/ They need to update their web page pointing to the repositories. I built 42.4 in fedora 13, once planetCCRMA is in place for fedora 14 (should be a month or so) I'll giv

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-08 Thread Pierre Massat
I m sorry to interrupt, but Planet CCRMA only exists for Fedora 12 right now, and that's the one i'm using. Pierre 2010/11/8 Hans-Christoph Steiner > > On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Oded Ben-Tal wrote: > > currently, and I don't know Fedora. Can anyone do a basic RPM spec file? >>> I figure we

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-08 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Oded Ben-Tal wrote: currently, and I don't know Fedora. Can anyone do a basic RPM spec file? I figure we could start with a really basic one that just packed up the files that are built from the existing build system. I'm pretty sure nando has a spec file fo

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-08 Thread Oded Ben-Tal
currently, and I don't know Fedora. Can anyone do a basic RPM spec file? I figure we could start with a really basic one that just packed up the files that are built from the existing build system. I'm pretty sure nando has a spec file for fedora13. These used to be up there with the srpms

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-07 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Jeff Sandys wrote: I 've read on Hans' website that Planet CCRMA needs a build of the latest Pd-extended. I have Fedora 12 on my laptop and I'm beginning to realize that it'd be actually cool to have an updated version of Pd to play with. I'd be glad to help, if

Re: [PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-04 Thread Jeff Sandys
> I 've read on Hans' website that Planet CCRMA needs a build of the latest > Pd-extended. I have Fedora 12 on my laptop and I'm beginning to realize that > it'd be actually cool to have an updated version of Pd to play with. > > I'd be glad to help, if : > 1- this isn't too complicated, because my

[PD] Fedora build of Pd-extended 0.42.5?

2010-11-04 Thread Pierre Massat
Hi, I 've read on Hans' website that Planet CCRMA needs a build of the latest Pd-extended. I have Fedora 12 on my laptop and I'm beginning to realize that it'd be actually cool to have an updated version of Pd to play with. I'd be glad to help, if : 1- this isn't too complicated, because my knowle