it is.
installing the update was easier than the workaround ;)
thanks again
On Sep 13, 2009, at 22:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It should be fixed in 0.41.4
.hc
On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:46 PM, rene beekman wrote:
Great! thanks!
Rene
On Sep 13, 2009, at 20:38, John Harrison wrote:
It should be fixed in 0.41.4
.hc
On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:46 PM, rene beekman wrote:
Great! thanks!
Rene
On Sep 13, 2009, at 20:38, John Harrison wrote:
Workaround:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2009-04/013366.html
BTW you might confirm that the 8.3 filename for Program Fil
Great! thanks!
Rene
On Sep 13, 2009, at 20:38, John Harrison wrote:
Workaround:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2009-04/013366.html
BTW you might confirm that the 8.3 filename for Program Files is
indeed PROGRA~1 on your system... I think it usually is but you can
check tha
Workaround:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2009-04/013366.html
BTW you might confirm that the 8.3 filename for Program Files is indeed
PROGRA~1 on your system... I think it usually is but you can check that from
the command line. I think there's a flag in the dir command to show you
Hi,
I'm trying to get Pd to find the GEM help patches for its objects, but
am having no luck so far.
Default installation of pd-extended (version 0.40.3) keeps giving me
'sorry, couldn't find help patch for ...' messages
I've added the path C/Program Files/pd/extra/Gem to paths. Still no lo
