hope it's still of use, here are the results on my machine:
when opening big_ugly_patch.pd on pd-0.40.3-extended-2007
REALTIME: 44.196
REALTIME: 20.901
REALTIME: 20.755
REALTIME: 20.892
on pd-0.40.3-extended-20071011
REALTIME: 37.788
REALTIME: 21.783
REALTIME: 20.706
REALTIME: 21.802
on Pd-
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> so for those who are able to run Pd from the commandline (which is
> practically everyone, though some might not know or find it
> inconvenient), the "." will eventually work.
> the others will have to change the "." to there
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 21:36 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> btw, did you now that you can use the "." as the path for "pd open"?
>
> wrong.
>
> this won't work as well, unless you start pd from within speedtest/ . i
> am actually quite happy about this example, beca
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 15:01 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I devised a quick test of loading speed and did some quick
> comparisons on my MacBook Pro 2.4GHz. (I am used to having one of
> the slowest machines around, my old 800Mhz Powerbook, so I still have
> to readjust my thinking)
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 21:36 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> btw, did you now that you can use the "." as the path for "pd open"?
wrong.
this won't work as well, unless you start pd from within speedtest/ . i
am actually quite happy about this example, because it illustrates well,
that 'op
On Nov 12, 2007, at 3:36 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> I devised a quick test of loading speed and did some quick
>> comparisons on my MacBook Pro 2.4GHz. (I am used to having one of
>> the slowest machines around, my old 800Mhz Powerbook, so I still
>>
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I'd be interested to see how this fares on other machines and OSes. I
> attached the patches
AMD Duron 1.3 GHz, Pd-0.39.3-extended-debian-stable-i386.deb
uname -a:
Linux minerva 2.6.22.10-k7-custom #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 31 16:02:02 CET
2007 i686 GNU/Linux
Load t
Very similar machine to yours, Hans, except a little slower (MBPro 2
GHz. OS X 10.4.10)
19 ms. -- 0.49.3-extended-20071108
19 ms. -- 0.40.3-extended-20071011
17 ms. -- 0.39.3-extended
I'm curious what effect the dual-core is having on this, too. I thought
I had chud loaded (Apple xcode
My laptop ...
pd-extended 0.39.3
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.60GHz
uname -a
Linux danomatika 2.6.20-16-lowlatency #2 SMP PREEMPT Sun Sep 23 19:54:02 UTC
2007 i686 GNU/Linux
REALTIME: 19.486
REALTIME: 15.002
REALTIME: 15.163
REALTIME: 19.944
REALTIME: 20.354
And for what its worth, my we
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 15:01 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I devised a quick test of loading speed and did some quick
> comparisons on my MacBook Pro 2.4GHz. (I am used to having one of
> the slowest machines around, my old 800Mhz Powerbook, so I still
> have
> to readjust my thinki
Slower machine
Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Maxtor IDE
533MHz VIA Eden
Vanilla 0.39.2
56.033
52.55
53.1
53.007
51.39
50.02
Faster machine
Linux 2.6.23-386
1.0GHz VIA Nehemia
Seagate IDE
Extended 0.40.3
30.30
22.09
22.26
23.15
24.001
23.0
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:01:03 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner
Steffen Juul wrote:
>On 12/11/2007, at 21.43, Martin Peach wrote:
>
>>I guess the first time loaded it into the disk
>>cache or something like that.
>
>Is it relevant if Pd is closed in between?
Closing pd in between I get:
REALTIME: 18.1368
REALTIME: 18.0402
REALTIME: 20.584
REALTIME: 18.0991
REA
On 12/11/2007, at 21.43, Martin Peach wrote:
> I guess the first time loaded it into the disk
> cache or something like that.
Is it relevant if Pd is closed in between?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lis
is just for
decoration.
Martin
>From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: PD list
>Subject: [PD] GUI speed test
>Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:01:03 -0500
>
>
>I devised a quick test of loading speed and did some quick comparisons on
>my MacBook Pro 2.4
On 12/11/2007, at 21.01, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 14ms Pd-0.39.3-extended
> 6.5ms Pd-0.40-2 vanilla
> 16ms Pd-0.40.3-extended-2007
9.7ms Pd-0.40-2 vanilla
9.7ms Pd-0.41-0-test5 vanilla
18.1ms Pd-0.39.3-extended
10.2ms Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071106
_
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> first time i opened the patch on pd-0.40-2(vanilla): 14-16ms (cannot
> remember)
> second time the file was already cached, which gives me a result of 4ms
> (pretty constant)
> REALTIME: 4.206
> REALTIME: 4.152
> REALTIME: 4.127
> REALTIME: 3.909
> REALTIME: 4.092
>
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I devised a quick test of loading speed and did some quick comparisons
> on my MacBook Pro 2.4GHz. (I am used to having one of the slowest
> machines around, my old 800Mhz Powerbook, so I still have to readjust my
> thinking). Here's my times:
>
> 14msPd
17 matches
Mail list logo
