On 12/05/2008, at 23.40, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Maybe you want to change that as well while you're at it
Good idea.
> - with an advance warning so I can adapt my filter in time.
Alternatively you could make your filter look for list-id in '"List-
ID:" [phrase] "<" list-id ">"' instead of (p
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmölnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> if nobody objects within the next week, i will change the subject-prefix
> from [PD] to [Pd] (and accordingly) on all Pd-related mailinglists.
Personally I filter by "List-Id:" but currently this is referring to
"PureData" which
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> I am more worried about spam filters of they are case sensitive, I
> had to train my mail programs (gmail [please don't shout at me...] and
> thunderbird), because some of the pd mails went to spam.
> maybe you can send out a testm
IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> Steffen Juul wrote:
>> On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>>> Derek Holzer wrote:
4) Grammar/spelling, of course
>>> Miller refers to "Pd" rather than "PD", shouldn't this canonical form be
>>> used? (which reminds me, that even the header of this
On 09/05/2008, at 11.27, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> changing the mail filters shouldn't be too hard ;-)
And why filter list-mail by subject? I might miss an obvious reason,
thats why i ask.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-manage
changing the mail filters shouldn't be too hard ;-)
i'd say, if you announce it again just before you do it, everyone should
be fine.
roman
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 08:55 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> Steffen Juul wrote:
> >
> > On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >
> >> De
Steffen Juul wrote:
>
> On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> Derek Holzer wrote:
>>>
>>> 4) Grammar/spelling, of course
>>
>> Miller refers to "Pd" rather than "PD", shouldn't this canonical form be
>> used? (which reminds me, that even the header of this list says [PD] :-|)
>
On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Derek Holzer wrote:
>>
>> 4) Grammar/spelling, of course
>
> Miller refers to "Pd" rather than "PD", shouldn't this canonical
> form be
> used? (which reminds me, that even the header of this list says
> [PD] :-|)
Oh dear. Any chance of ch
