I would like to have some tables that are local to a patch. Although
I can make [table $0-foo 100], I can't figure any way to send it
messages.Also, why don't tables have an inlet so you can send
them messages directly? If they did, I could just write
[r $0-foo]
|
[table 100]
which
David F. Place wrote:
> I would like to have some tables that are local to a patch. Although
> I can make [table $0-foo 100], I can't figure any way to send it
> messages.
"message to table"
|
[s $0-foo]
???
(the [s $0-foo] must be in the same file, because of the nature of $0)
> Also,
Hallo,
Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> > Also, why don't tables have an inlet so you can send
> > them messages directly? If they did, I could just write
> >
> > [r $0-foo]
> >|
> > [table 100]
> >
> > which seems more in the style of everything else.
>
On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> "message to table"
> |
> [s $0-foo]
Perfect! Thanks.
--o---o-o-o---o-o-o---
David F. Place
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
>
> (the [s $0-foo] must be in the same file, because of the nature of $0)
>
> > Also, why don't tables have an inlet so you can send
>> them messages directly? If they did, I could just write
>
> Would be handy, I must admit.
tables _did_ have inlets until pd0.3
i heard they went on strike about a lack of [chair] objects.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
