Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> How can I use that library under osx. do I have to compile something? I
> found that c code in the package, but have no idea how to deal with
> it??? thnx,
You need to install pyODE. If you start python and can do a "import
ode"
How can I use that library under osx. do I have to compile something? I
found that c code in the package, but have no idea how to deal with
it??? thnx,
marius.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
>
>> i'm using pyODE within py/pyext, which works pre
> That would be more straightforward (and fast) to simply send the whole
> transformation matrix :
>
> shapes cubes foo 0.234 1.000 ...
Yes, as Frank has said, I am using OSC this way. Vectors are sent as
three arguments in a message. Actually I recently had a discussion
about this... one opinio
Hallo,
Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> Stephen, DIMPLE looks very promising. I am looking forward to try it
> soon. (plus, I will see it at NIME) I think the C++ way using OSC or
> an other protocol is a very good way to go. Wouldn't have you prefered
> FUDI or an other p
Hi,
Stephen, DIMPLE looks very promising. I am looking forward to try it
soon. (plus, I will see it at NIME) I think the C++ way using OSC or
an other protocol is a very good way to go. Wouldn't have you prefered
FUDI or an other protocol that allows more than one float at a time to
be sent ? For i
Hi,
Try my DIMPLE software.
Still very alpha, but it works.
Sorry, binary is only for Windows, so you'll have to compile it otherwise.
http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~sinclair/content/dimple
Anyways it basically allows you to talk to ODE using OSC.
Steve
On 4/17/07, Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTE
Hallo,
Thomas Grill hat gesagt: // Thomas Grill wrote:
> i'm using pyODE within py/pyext, which works pretty well.
Actually that's what I do as well.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org_ __goto10.org__
___
PD-list@iem.at mai
ODE is much more powerful, with collision detection etc.
On the other hand, it has no realtime guarantee, that's why i'm
always running pyODE in py/pyext detached mode.
greetings, Thomas
Am 17.04.2007 um 11:48 schrieb Tim Boykett:
>
> isn't the PMPD extension just this? Or is it a new implement
Tim Boykett a écrit :
> isn't the PMPD extension just this?
no.
pmpd's masses have no volume. so they can not rotate.
ode is lot's more complex.
cyrille
Or is it a new implementation of
> dynamics?
>
> tm
>
>
> On 17/04/2007, at 9:04 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> Hallo,
>> Alexandre Que
isn't the PMPD extension just this? Or is it a new implementation of
dynamics?
tm
On 17/04/2007, at 9:04 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
>
>> I wonder if there is somewhere an external that wraps the Open
>> Dynamic
>> Engine ? ht
Hi,
i'm using pyODE within py/pyext, which works pretty well.
greetings,
Thomas
Am 17.04.2007 um 02:44 schrieb Alexandre Quessy:
> Hi !
> I wonder if there is somewhere an external that wraps the Open Dynamic
> Engine ? http://www.ode.org/ is a library for physical simulation.
>
> Cheers,
> --
Hallo,
Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> I wonder if there is somewhere an external that wraps the Open Dynamic
> Engine ? http://www.ode.org/ is a library for physical simulation.
Yes, I have a working prototype. I can send it to you, if you want,
but there are no docs ye
Hi !
I wonder if there is somewhere an external that wraps the Open Dynamic
Engine ? http://www.ode.org/ is a library for physical simulation.
Cheers,
--
Alexandre Quessy
http://alexandre.quessy.net
http://www.puredata.info/Members/aalex
___
PD-list@ie
13 matches
Mail list logo
