Re: [PD] OSC bundles with time tag

2007-08-31 Thread Torsten Anders
Dear Martin, thank you very much for your reply. Did you try sending to and from pd on the the same machine? I sent timestamped OSC bundles from the UNIX sendOSC app to PD on the same machine. Notice that 3.6 million milliseconds is one hour. It may be a timezone thing. The OSC spec

Re: [PD] OSC bundles with time tag

2007-08-31 Thread Martin Peach
Thanks for helping to debug it, Torsten ;) I just tried the same sending from packOSC using a WinXP pc and receiving with unpackOSC on a linux box. I get a delay here in Montreal of +4 hours, which corresponds to the difference between EDT and GMT. So it looks like the linux/mac version is

[PD] OSC bundles with time tag

2007-08-30 Thread Torsten Anders
Dear all, I am sending OSC messages from the UNIX app sendOSC to Pd using the Pd object [dumpOSC] -- it worked out of the box, very nice! However, it seems that [dumpOSC] always reacts immediately -- regardless of any time stamp (16 figure hex number according to OSC specs). Is it at all

Re: [PD] OSC bundles with time tag

2007-08-30 Thread Stephen Sinclair
So, to answer this post as well as H.C.'s previous query on the topic, I had a look at the dumpOSC code and indeed it doesn't handle the timetags. The only related code is the following: /* Print the time tag */ #ifdef DEBUG printf([

Re: [PD] OSC bundles with time tag

2007-08-30 Thread martin.peach
Stephen Sinclair wrote: I suggest you have a look at the OSC objects in the mrpeach folder, as I think they have better support for timetags among other things. Yes, look at routeOSC-help and packOSC-help to see how it's done. You'll need a recent version, it's only 6 weeks old... Martin

Re: [PD] OSC bundles with time tag

2007-08-30 Thread Torsten Anders
Dear Steve, thanks for your quick and helpful reply! Unfortunately, using [unpackOSC] -- just using routeOSC-help.pd -- I was not able to delay the effect of OSC messages either. This helpfile patch shows some delay, but that is always negative (something in the order of -3.5e+06 msecs),