It occurred to me that installing pd on my Windows XP professional
computer may be working by accident. I installed it over an earlier
version of Pd, so it might be using the earlier version of the [expr]
library. Deleting my pd directory and reinstalling proved my
conjecture.
Bug: If
> Bug: If you install Pd-0.41-2.msw.exe on a fresh computer, it does
> not work. It's missing [expr].
>
on linux you have to add [expr] to the path, i don't remember having to
do this on previous versions
thanks
rob c
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing l
this missing dll sounds like a bug, maybe we should submit a report in
the bug tracker? Fortunately we can get expr.dll from earlier versions.
David F. Place a écrit :
> It occurred to me that installing pd on my Windows XP professional
> computer may be working by accident. I installed it ove
I better check this... usually, I specifically test 'expr' on windows before
letting it out (since my build setup is prone to errors). Will try it next
I can get to a windows machine.
cheers
MIller
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 11:33:07PM -0500, David F. Place wrote:
>
> It occurred to me that instal
