Hi all,
Quick question - is there a way to set a new target object for a [send], in
the same way it is possible to send a [set xyz( to a [receive~] to change its
source?
Thanks,
robert.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-manage
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location
you want to send to:
[;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123(
|
[;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1".
marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick question - is there a way to set a new target object
On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
> you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location
> you want to send to:
> [;receiver1 123(
>
> or with variables:
>
> [receiver1 123(
>
> [;$1 $2(
>
> that will send 123 to "receiver1".
> marius.
I'd never thought to
you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd
0.40 or 0.41???
frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some
days ago.
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/attachment.txt
marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
> On Sun
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now
sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
cheers
Miller
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
> you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd
> 0.40 or 0.41???
> frank bark
Sweet! I don't remember when you put that in either, I never noticed
before. Seems it needs the "symbol" selector in front of the message for
the send name, btw.
-Chuckk
On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now
sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
Sweet! I don't remember when you put that in either, I never noticed
before. Seems
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd
> 0.40 or 0.41???
> frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some
> days ago.
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachme
Le dimanche 19 août 2007 à 03:08 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
> > On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now
> >> sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
> > S
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> You have confused me with Matteo, who is not to be confused with
>> Matju. ;)
>
> You will further learn that in my apartment it is necessary to
> distinguish between Mathieu and Mattias.
thank you for the information.
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
You have confused me with Matteo, who is not to be confused with Matju.
;)
You will further learn that in my apartment it is necessary to distinguish
between Mathieu and Mattias.
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
|
On Sunday 19 August 2007 04:50, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now
> sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
>
> cheers
> Miller
*goes to update his pd*
This sort of thing makes me happy.
Thanks all.
robert.
___
moin Robert,
if you're using an older pd, or don't want to update yet, the
[sprinkler] external (in CVS and/or pd-extended) acts like a dynamic
[send], using its selector (or the first element of its argument list,
if the selector is "list", "symbol", or "float") as the name of the send
target...
13 matches
Mail list logo
