Ok, thanks everybody! List append does the trick.
2010/6/30 IOhannes m zmoelnig
> On 2010-06-30 14:09, Olivier Baudu wrote:
> > Or, simpler... [l ]
> >
>
> being the upstream author of [lister] (and thus [l]), i would recommend
> to use [list append] whenever it's possible.
> it basically provid
On 2010-06-30 14:09, Olivier Baudu wrote:
> Or, simpler... [l ]
>
being the upstream author of [lister] (and thus [l]), i would recommend
to use [list append] whenever it's possible.
it basically provides the same functionality as [l] and is built-in.
similar arguments go for the other objects
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Olivier Baudu wrote:
> Or, simpler... [l ]
>
> Or maybe list-fifo from list-abs
cheers
luca/husk
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[list], [list prepend], [lister] from zexy.
Or with the message [set(.
++
Jack
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010 à 13:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> On 2010-06-30 13:40, Pierre Massat wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I m wondering if there would be a simple way of storing a list, just like [f
> >
Or, simpler... [l ]
01ivier
2010/6/30 IOhannes m zmoelnig
> On 2010-06-30 13:40, Pierre Massat wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I m wondering if there would be a simple way of storing a list, just like
> [f
> > ] stores a float. My list is the output of a rather long [pack] object.
> > Can use a two-
On 2010-06-30 13:40, Pierre Massat wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I m wondering if there would be a simple way of storing a list, just like [f
> ] stores a float. My list is the output of a rather long [pack] object.
> Can use a two-stage pack? Something like that :
>
how about [list append]?
fgnasdr
IOh
Hi all!
I m wondering if there would be a simple way of storing a list, just like [f
] stores a float. My list is the output of a rather long [pack] object.
Can use a two-stage pack? Something like that :
[pack 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
|
\
\
\
\
\
[pack 0 0]
The idea would be
