Hearing it from the front line is really interesting Chuck. I am
a little envious at the excitement a project like that must
produce.
Do you know of Joe Deken and the suitcase supercomputer
project? He is a big Pd proponent (and friend of Miller I believe)
and they are also looking at R-Pi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Andy Farnell
padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote:
Hearing it from the front line is really interesting Chuck. I am
a little envious at the excitement a project like that must
produce.
Do you know of Joe Deken and the suitcase supercomputer
project? He is a big
yeah, with this sort of thing...
Miller was saying the other day how the original phase vocoder patch
required $35000 worth of hardware (or whatever the actual figure was...)
So i was just wondering what sort of audio things are round at the moment
that can only be achieved with well beyond
probably going well off topic now,
but what sort of new audio processes would be made possible by
supercomputing???
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Well, there's almost no end of applications that wouldn't be improved
or made usable by a hundred-fold increase in CPU. But things that aren't
currently possible for commercial or domestic use might be;
In processing, blind source separation using dictionary attack to find
optimal sparse
yeah, separating individual instruments / voices from a mix does seem like
a 'just over the horizon' application. I'd love to be able to have a
stereo microphone in the room i'm in now, and separate the sound of the
rain, the wind, the TV in the background, my typing at this keyboard
now my question is;
spending 4k to build a Pi supercomputer can give you more power and
possibilities than with a top of the line MAC for example (which will cost
just as much, and be a quad core 2.7 intel i7, 1.6GHz bus, 16GB Ram).
I'm guessing that CPU wize it would be more powerful indeed;
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres
por...@gmail.com wrote:
now my question is;
spending 4k to build a Pi supercomputer can give you more power and
possibilities than with a top of the line MAC for example (which will cost
just as much, and be a quad core 2.7 intel i7,
i go bananas wrote:
yeah, separating individual instruments / voices from a mix does seem like
a 'just over the horizon' application. I'd love to be able to have a
stereo microphone in the room i'm in now, and separate the sound of the
rain, the wind, the TV in the background, my typing at
maybe melodyne?
http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=products_studio
cheers
der.brant
Zitat von Charles Goyard c...@fsck.fr:
i go bananas wrote:
yeah, separating individual instruments / voices from a mix does seem like
a 'just over the horizon' application. I'd love to be able to
Clearly there are cheaper computers other than apple, so I'm using it for
comparison to give the raspberry pi more chance to stand out in power.
But yeah, I made a bad comparison. First, you can actually have an apple
macbook pro 2.7Ghz i7 for 2.5k, I was picking a top configuration model to
bra...@subnet.at wrote:
maybe melodyne?
http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=products_studio
The name does not ring a bell, but it could be.
Thanks
Charles
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:24:45AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
now my question is;
spending 4k to build a Pi supercomputer can give you more power and
possibilities than with a top of the line MAC for example (which will cost
just as much, and be a quad core 2.7 intel i7, 1.6GHz
Being so amazed as I am on the cheapness of the Pi, I wanted to also
compare its processing power to the chips on an iphone, for example. Well,
apparently apple wont even tell you the details of it's chip clock speed.
that's gotta suck
so, being it that cheap, it'd be great if it also were an
Thanks a lot Andy, that was really informative.
So I see there's no point at all comparing this super Pi rack to general
computers, and that you can't run one Pd having it being served by 64 of
these.
cheers
2012/9/16 Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:24:45AM
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:47:22PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Thanks a lot Andy, that was really informative.
So I see there's no point at all comparing this super Pi rack to general
computers, and that you can't run one Pd having it being served by 64 of
these.
cheers
Maybe I am mistaken but the real, deep objectives of the Pi foundation
are to ubiquitize (yuck!!!) (maybe democratise?) production
through open hardware design so that you can get a fab plant to
start making them locally.
For what I saw, the circuitry is not opened, or is it? I fear that,
But then I found about the beagleboard, which is open and have the
schematics on their website http://beagleboard.org/hardware/design
it's more powerful than the Pi, but seems rather expensive still. It's
$150, which is not that much less than an iphone. And if you take all the
phone cost/screen
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres
por...@gmail.comwrote:
so, being it that cheap, it'd be great if it also were an open hardware,
such as the arduino.
I then found stuff like the beagleboard, which is open and all, but the
200$ seemed pricy, that's 1/3 of Mac Mini
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres
por...@gmail.comwrote:
For what I saw, the circuitry is not opened, or is it? I fear that,
unfortunately, I didn't see it anywhere so it seems they haven't done that,
although they are surely willing to disseminate the usage of
i guess i'll chime in here and mention that some folks are designing an ARM
CortexA8-based computer based on a PCMCIA card (its called an EOMA68 card).
the card can be put inside an enclosure that would offer breakouts if
needed. the biggest difference here is that they are trying to do the whole
On 17/09/12 07:41, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
it's more powerful than the Pi, but seems rather expensive still. It's
$150, which is not that much less than an iphone. And if you take all the
phone cost/screen and etc so you get only a single board, it should be
cheaper and more powerful.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Andy Farnell
padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:24:45AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
now my question is;
spending 4k to build a Pi supercomputer can give you more power and
possibilities than with a top of the line MAC for
Nice, but what kind of enclosure wold that be?
to me this card form factor seems to be only good to fit in a laptop
computer, do they use it for something else?
thanks
2012/9/16 Scott R. Looney scottrloo...@gmail.com
i guess i'll chime in here and mention that some folks are designing an
anyone seen this?
I bet it can open several phase vocoder patches
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/09/lego-super-gallery/?utm_source=facebookutm_medium=socialmediautm_campaign=facebookclickthru
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
On 15.9.2012, at 22:40 , Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
I bet it can open several phase vocoder patches
64 on this one, strictly speaking.
--
keep your ears open: http://blauwurf.at
http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist
___
Pd-list@iem.at
you mean like with this sort of thing, or supercomputer google style?
2012/9/15 i go bananas hard@gmail.com
probably going well off topic now,
but what sort of new audio processes would be made possible by
supercomputing???
___
Pd-list@iem.at
27 matches
Mail list logo
