Re: [PD] UDP vs TCP, for OSC networking

2014-01-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-01-14 04:41, Ryan Smith wrote: packet loss is an issue and most people use UDP since it will be faster. Then if you're running into packet loss, for whatever reason, try switching to TCP. UDP will be faster, as it has less overhead: -

[PD] UDP vs TCP, for OSC networking

2014-01-13 Thread Jonghyun Kim
Hi list, I'm sending data between two computers, in every 10ms. For fast networking, TCP is better result? I don't know which is better. Most tutorials show example of OSC with UDP. Why? Thanks, Jong ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] UDP vs TCP, for OSC networking

2014-01-13 Thread Scott R. Looney
hi, i'm not an expert on PD but my feeling was that TCP does error checking while UDP does not, and that at least is one reason why TCP should be slower than UDP in a typical networking situation. scott On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Jonghyun Kim agitato...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, I'm

Re: [PD] UDP vs TCP, for OSC networking

2014-01-13 Thread Ryan Smith
Pretty much. TCP ensures that every packet gets there intact. You have a back and forth between the server of the packet and the client to make sure. UDP just sends the packet where you ask, and doesn't confirm whether it makes it at all. Generally for most OSC use the number of packets you're