Hi,
actually wrap~ seems really buggy. Maybe its the nature of its concept,
anyway my fix is to wrap wrap~ into [wrap-switch~] that has a sig~
connected to the wrap~ inlet and then a [r wrapswitch]. Now you can
change the wrapping on all wrap~´s just by sending 0,1 or even 2 to [r
wrapswitch].
cool, thanks frank. this makes a nice squelchy type of synth if you
slide the values.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> I wish you luck. Perhaps on Elvis' birthday, 8 Jan, you can perform
> a sacrificial burning of a VHS copy of "Back to the future" and
> send that evil spirit away..
Play it backwards before!
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
On 11/12/2007, at 7:56 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
>
> I put ntpd on. When it boots it has the right time
> for a while and then it ignores that and goes back
> to the future.
"Back to the future"a suspicious effect
>
> If this doesn't work, how do you go about getting a
> computer exorcism?
Ha
³An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind
theirs.²
Edgard Varèse
.andre wrote:
> is this just me, or why are Andys emails always in the future ?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
htt
Yep, Claude picked up on this and I changed it.
Then it changed itself back.
So someone else mentioned it and next time
I reset the motherboard. It changed itself back.
I put ntpd on. When it boots it has the right time
for a while and then it ignores that and goes back
to the future.
I just ch
is this just me, or why are Andys emails always in the future ?
my date is atm: Tue Dec 11 19:03:36 CET 2007
.andre
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 04:21 +, Andy Farnell wrote:
> Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:07:17 +0100
> Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hallo,
Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> >> Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
> >
> > Theoretically yes, but practically it seems that adding the second
> > wrap~ after wrap~ is exactly what fixes the problem!
>
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail
>> Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
>
> Theoretically yes, but practically it seems that adding the second
> wrap~ after wrap~ is exactly what fixes the problem!
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-05/049886.html
Hope this helps...
Claude
_
Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
> Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
Theoretically yes, but practically it seems that adding the second
wrap~ after wrap~ is exactly what fixes the problem! I even could omit
the additions you made by just doing the seemingly idi
I see the occasional spike on the rhs of samplehold so
rescaling and clipping seems to fix it. Not a good solution
because it fixes the symptom not the cause, but seems to work.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:07:17 +0100
Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is some stretched p
Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:07:17 +0100
Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is some stretched phasor~ fun for your classic synthesis
> methods class: an implementation of the VOSIM algorithm for speech
> synthesis etc. as inv
Hi,
attached is some stretched phasor~ fun for your classic synthesis
methods class: an implementation of the VOSIM algorithm for speech
synthesis etc. as invented by Kaegi/Templaars.
My implementation is almost correct, but has a slight bug, which you
can see if you set M and T to the values i
13 matches
Mail list logo
