Hi,
I have tried to change graph-on-parents settings by message for
displaying different arrays, it seems to work..
I did'nt test it with large tables.
(included patch : switchingGOPtables.pd).
Jean Yves Gratius http://jy.gratius.free.fr
Chuckk Hubbard a crit :
On Dec 9, 2007 10:50
Well-done, that looks like the perfect solution. I did notice these
functions mentioned in the code, with xmargin and ymargin as arguments
of a longer function call, but I hadn't followed up to see what else
went in the message.
I believe this is your answer, Phil.
Another one for msg-docs, I
A glorious hack, Jean-Yves! This should work well for what I am
envisioning. One strange thing, though: if you move the subpatch (that
displays the selected array), the other array is visible underneath it.
I wonder what's up with that?
Thanks for the solution, Jean-Yves (and Chuck for
This does not answer your question exactly, but remember you can use the [set(
method of [tabread~] objects to change arrays.
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:26:23 -0800
Phil Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This probably fits into the category of a wish for PD; I think there's
no way to do it
Hi Andy,
I think what I'm asking for would be more like a [set( method on an
array, to change the data it sees. Not a trivial thing, I know
(especially if Miller has thought about it and not come up with a way to
do it!)
Phil
Andy Farnell wrote:
This does not answer your question
On Dec 9, 2007 10:50 PM, Phil Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I think you're right; there's no way to avoid the copying. It's good to
dream, though. :-)
I have done some experimenting, and I think I'm on to something. If
you create a graph from the put menu, then right-click and
This probably fits into the category of a wish for PD; I think there's
no way to do it currently, but I'd love to be proven wrong!
I'd like to be able to change the data an array points to rather than
actually change the data in the array. The scenario which me think of
this is, I'd like to
I've wanted to do this too -- for instance, to have a large
collection of arrays and a window that could see one of them at
a time to edit them.
It's a bit complicated to do it because every array would have to
maintain a dynamic collection of pointers to every window (there could
be meny) in
It would be possible, if not CPU-efficient, to have them all hidden in
table objects, and simply use tabread and tabwrite to copy them to the
skeleton array when you want to switch. You would only need one
tabread and tabwrite pair, just different ways to specify the target
of tabread.
I would
