On 02/12/2006, at 10.30, Frank Barknecht wrote:
However with the metro it will be much easier to know when the fake
phasor reaches 1 or 0.
That's what bang'ed my question. Thanks for explaining.
Bets, Steffen
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUB
Hallo,
padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
> Cool! We've discovered something "very wrong".
Maybe not, read on.
> Here I get
>
> number bcalcecalcbcplxecplx
>
> 4 70 80 110
Cool! We've discovered something "very wrong".
Here I get
number bcalcecalcbcplxecplx
4 70 80 110 290
8 140 160 210 560
16 260
Hallo,
padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
> Is it just me though or is [expr ] really slow? I try to avoid it
> because almost every patch that uses [expr] on my machine runs about
> 50% slower than the equivilent arithmetic using atomic ops.
Attached is a simple benchmark patch, which be
well i ended up doing a metro and vline~ job. this patch is still
unfinished, but it's working enough that i could take a rest from
patching and have a mess round with it today. i posted the workign
draft on the forum:
http://puredata.hurleur.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2494#p2494
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:57:44 +0100
Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo,
> padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
>
> > I guess just because they drift off. Or at least you cant be sure of
> > keeping them together.
>
>
> > Sometimes you want a whole bunch of things to all happ
Hallo,
padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
> I guess just because they drift off. Or at least you cant be sure of
> keeping them together.
> Sometimes you want a whole bunch of things to all happen "synchronously", to
> all happen in the same phase every time. An example is the paf~ algo
Hallo,
Steffen hat gesagt: // Steffen wrote:
> On 01/12/2006, at 14.35, hard off wrote:
>
> >i want a phasor~ to send a bang when the signal reaches 1.
>
> I the risk of showing off serious lack of knowledge: When is this
> approach different from using a metro object with the same
> "freque
I guess just because they drift off. Or at least you cant be sure of keeping
them
together.
Sometimes you want a whole bunch of things to all happen "synchronously", to
all happen in the same phase every time. An example is the paf~ algorithm,
and here's little drum machine example attached.
On 01/12/2006, at 14.35, hard off wrote:
i want a phasor~ to send a bang when the signal reaches 1.
I the risk of showing off serious lack of knowledge: When is this
approach different from using a metro object with the same
"frequency" as the phasor~?
__
The solution Marius offered is probably the most
reliable. I've used Jamies [snapshot~] based solution
in many cases it works fine, but sometimes misses a beat.
It's because the blocksize (nominally 64) on which [snapshot~]
operates may not contain the zero you're looking for.
The thing you want
hi,
Are you aware, that with interpolation the signal might not reach 1 but
reset the phasor at some point below 1?
so it depends how accurate the bang should be. My idea is to use the
derivative of the function, which is negative at the point where the
phasor~ resets.
you will need some objec
[phasor] [bang~]
| /
[snapshot~]
|
[> 0.99]
|
[sel 1]
?
Jamie
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 22:35 +0900, hard off wrote:
> i want a phasor~ to send a bang when the signal reaches 1. any ideas?
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSC
i want a phasor~ to send a bang when the signal reaches 1. any ideas?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
14 matches
Mail list logo
