On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:31 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:07:08AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >
> > >I would love a proper way for Pd vanilla/core to load libraries
> > >into abstractions. I know of [import]
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:07:08AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> >I would love a proper way for Pd vanilla/core to load libraries
> >into abstractions. I know of [import] but most of my abstraction
> >libraries target vanilla installs, too, s
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:26 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > Personally, I'd prefer to not auto-load anything at all, which would
> > also encourage a nice patching style with explicitly loading the
> > required libraries.
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I would love a proper way for Pd vanilla/core to load libraries
into abstractions. I know of [import] but most of my abstraction
libraries target vanilla installs, too, so I cannot use it. And
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:18 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:43:08PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > Last time I checked, [declare] indeed was working inside abstractions.
>
> Depends on what you call "working" ...
>
> Quoting the help file:
>
> WARNING: y
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I would love a proper way for Pd vanilla/core to load libraries into
abstractions. I know of [import] but most of my abstraction libraries
target vanilla installs, too, so I cannot use it. And [declare]
currently is designed for top-level _main.pd-st
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:43:08PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Last time I checked, [declare] indeed was working inside abstractions.
Depends on what you call "working" ...
Quoting the help file:
WARNING: you might want to avoid putting "declare"
statements inside abstractions, a
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:26 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > Personally, I'd prefer to not auto-load anything at all, which would
> > also encourage a nice patching style with explicitly loading the
> > required libraries.
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Personally, I'd prefer to not auto-load anything at all, which would
> also encourage a nice patching style with explicitly loading the
> required libraries. I'd be interested to hear what others think about
> the matter.
I wo
Sorry for my random rant, but it seems purely illogical to me, that for
instance maxlib is loaded on default, which seems to have no maintainer
anymore, is buggy in some respects and creates name clashes, while
iemmatrix, a clean library, which has an active maintainer with a
well-established reput
10 matches
Mail list logo