[PD] content of table is saved in Pd-extended?? was: " get the values of an array as a list"

Hi I just realized, that my little patch posted previously is ~40kB heavy. Sorry for filling your mail boxes with zeros. Unlike Pd-vanilla, Pd-extended seems to save the content of a [table] object in the .pd-file. Why was that changed? Is there any way to have the content _not_ saved with the

Re: [PD] content of table is saved in Pd-extended?? was: " get the values of an array as a list"

in array you can click or unclick save contents. is that what you are talking about? J On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hi > > I just realized, that my little patch posted previously is ~40kB heavy. > Sorry for filling your mail boxes with zeros. > > Unlike Pd-vanilla, Pd-

Re: [PD] content of table is saved in Pd-extended?? was: " get the values of an array as a list"

No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is really no way not to save table data in Pd-extended. Roman On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 12:20 -0800, Jaime Oliver wrote: > in array y

Re: [PD] content of table is saved in Pd-extended?? was: " get the values of an array as a list"

Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in > Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case > on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is really no way not to save table > data in Pd-extended. It wasn't

Re: [PD] content of table is saved in Pd-extended?? was: " get the values of an array as a list"

Am 22.01.10 11:29 schrieb "Frank Barknecht" unter : > Hallo, > Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in >> Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case >> on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is re