Hi
I just realized, that my little patch posted previously is ~40kB heavy.
Sorry for filling your mail boxes with zeros.
Unlike Pd-vanilla, Pd-extended seems to save the content of a [table] object
in the .pd-file. Why was that changed? Is there any way to have the content
_not_ saved with the
in array you can click or unclick save contents. is that what you are
talking about?
J
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just realized, that my little patch posted previously is ~40kB heavy.
> Sorry for filling your mail boxes with zeros.
>
> Unlike Pd-vanilla, Pd-
No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in
Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case
on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is really no way not to save table
data in Pd-extended.
Roman
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 12:20 -0800, Jaime Oliver wrote:
> in array y
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in
> Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case
> on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is really no way not to save table
> data in Pd-extended.
It wasn't
Am 22.01.10 11:29 schrieb "Frank Barknecht" unter :
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> No, I really mean the [table] object. I am irritated, that in
>> Pd-extended its content is saved with the patch, which is not the case
>> on Pd-vanilla. I wonder, if there is re