Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Many thanks for all your help so far Hans! Really appreciate it! Please allow me one more question regarding the installer. Namely, when I do: sudo make prefix=/usr install inside pd-extended/packages/linux_make/ folder, the installer fails if one does not remove manually smylinks created for

Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Okay this helps. thanks a lot for your answer. Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >They are part of pd-extended, and they build properly on the build >machines. Check the nightly builds for more info: >http://autobuild.puredata.info/ > >.hc > >On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:

Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
They are part of pd-extended, and they build properly on the build machines. Check the nightly builds for more info: http://autobuild.puredata.info/ .hc On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: However the cxc library and markex are a part of the default.pdextended file provid

Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
However the cxc library and markex are a part of the default.pdextended file provided in the packages/linux_make dir which means that they are apparently a part of pd-extended, yet they fail to build properly using default build scripts. So are they a part of pd-extended or not? Hans-Christoph

Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
You have the right source for that file, packages/linux_make. But I don't think your problems below have anything to do with that file, rather how the libraries were built and installed. .hc On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: These are however included in the example def

Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
These are however included in the example default.pdsettings inside of the packages/linux_make folder. Hence my confusion. So, where is the "official" default.pdsettings then located? Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >For something like list-abs, with only abstractions, its just a question >of

Re: [PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
For something like list-abs, with only abstractions, its just a question of getting the files in the right place. Look at the Pd-extended release for an example. For the "can't find symbol" errors, looks like those objects weren't built properly. Looks like you also threw in a markex.pd_linux a

[PD] default.pdextended in the latest 0.42.x extended release and failure to load some of the libs

2010-12-01 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Hans (and others who may know the answer to the following question), I've tried using default.pdextended included in the ~/pd-extended/packages/linux_make/ folder in conjunction with the latest build of pd-extended (built from scratch) for auto-loading some of the libs and found that some of the n