On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, samuel rowe wrote:
I have to restart my computer to get sound back.
I believe that this is a problem you better figure out before doing
anything else, because it's going to be annoying.
IF YOU DECIDE TO OPEN THE PATCH, BE CAREFUL, YOU MIGHT HAVE TO RESTART
LIKE I MENTI
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, samuel rowe wrote:
I had a read about wrap, and how it outputs the difference between the
input and nearest integer, like the output of 1.75 would be 0.25.
No, 1.75 becomes 0.75, while -1.75 becomes 0.25. The output of [wrap~] is
the difference between input and the integ
managed to
do this?
From: samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk
To: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:08:23 +0000
Subject: Re: [PD] delay lines
I'm not quite sure what you mean, simply using [tabread~] and
[tabwrite~] where I've used [delread~] and [delwrite~]? I wasn't
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Miller Puckette wrote:
Nothing specific, but the current implemtnation has 4 wraparound points
(which assumes that interpolation goes up to 4 points) -- seems unnecessarily
arbitrary to me.
Then what would you change it to, instead ?
_
tarting out, I'd stick to [delread~] and [delwrite~]. Have you managed to
do this?
From: samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk
To: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:08:23 +
Subject: Re: [PD] delay lines
I'm not quite sure what you mean, simply using [tabread~] and
[tabwri
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, samuel rowe wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you mean, simply using [tabread~] and
[tabwrite~] where I've used [delread~] and [delwrite~]? I wasn't aware
you could specify a location in an array, I thought you just read it
all?
Well, just read about [tabread~] and [tabwrit
t forward for delay lines.
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:04:15 -0400
> From: ma...@artengine.ca
> To: samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk
> CC: pd-list@iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] delay lines
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, samuel rowe wrote:
>
> > I'm not quite sure what you mean,
No idea... power of 2 buffer so masking is easy? add a variable number
of wraparound points and adjust it depending on what "delread" style
objects pop up? There are plenty of things it could end up as :)
Miller
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:58:51AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr
I have been searching extensively on the internet for how to do this, but I
can't find anything. I'm just struggling to visualize how I would do this,
especially as one would need to read and write right->left.
I had a read about wrap, and how it outputs the difference between the input
and nea
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, samuel rowe wrote:
Mathieu, just out of interest, what are the [phasor~] s used for?
[phasor~] can be thought of as a cycling counter. It counts up to 1 and
then instead of giving a 1 it drops to 0 and starts again. This can be
used to loop through a recorded sound in a
I'm not quite sure what you mean, simply using [tabread~] and
[tabwrite~] where I've used [delread~] and [delwrite~]? I wasn't aware
you could specify a location in an array, I thought you just read it
all?
Sorry, I'm pretty new to using delay lines and arrays in Pd
Thanks
I'm not quite sure what you mean, simply using [tabread~] and
[tabwrite~] where I've used [delread~] and [delwrite~]? I wasn't aware
you could specify a location in an array, I thought you just read it
all?
Sorry, I'm pretty new to using delay lines and arrays in Pd
Thanks
Nothing specific, but the current implemtnation has 4 wraparound points
(which assumes that interpolation goes up to 4 points) -- seems unnecessarily
arbitrary to me.
cheers
M
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:34:34PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Miller Puckette wrote:
>
> >I t
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Miller Puckette wrote:
I thought about this for quite some time, but couldn't see that unifying
the two would bring enough benefit to be worth it. In particular, the
particular way wraparound is handled in delay lines might change with the
iplementation, but making the actu
I thought about this for quite some time, but couldn't see that unifying
the two would bring enough benefit to be worth it. In particular, the
particular way wraparound is handled in delay lines might change with the
iplementation, but making the actual storage visible as a table would
lock us int
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, samuel rowe wrote:
I've been trying to modify some bi-directional delay lines I found in
the archives At the moment I can only select the input position in the
delay line, then connect it up to another one via a scattering junction
and select the output position for the se
16 matches
Mail list logo
