Thanks to this thread, I think I fixed the problem with cyclone too...
.hc
On Jan 11, 2007, at 5:53 AM, ugur guney wrote:
On 1/10/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi.
first off: please _always_ reply to the pd-list and not just me; the
list is not just a way to get into con
On 1/10/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi.
first off: please _always_ reply to the pd-list and not just me; the
list is not just a way to get into contact with others, but also a way
to learn things "passively" (e.g. by lurking on the list or by reading
the archives)...
#
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Strange, this is happening with the cyclone/toxy objects too. I
wonder what's causing it...
I had the same problem with the cyclone/switch object in the 38.4
pd-extended on windows.
/Anders
.hc
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:50 PM, ugur guney wrote:
# Hi list!
# I
hi.
first off: please _always_ reply to the pd-list and not just me; the
list is not just a way to get into contact with others, but also a way
to learn things "passively" (e.g. by lurking on the list or by reading
the archives)...
ugur guney wrote:
> C:\MinGW\bin>gcc -v
> Reading specs from ../l
ugur guney wrote:
> # Hi list!
> # I'm trying to learn how to write externals (after being able to link
> and compile the source codes thanks to Yvan Vander Sanden's tutorial)
> and come up with a strange behavoir: The object [additive~] turns into a
> messege box [additive~( (and sometimes its bor
Strange, this is happening with the cyclone/toxy objects too. I
wonder what's causing it...
.hc
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:50 PM, ugur guney wrote:
# Hi list!
# I'm trying to learn how to write externals (after being able to
link and compile the source codes thanks to Yvan Vander Sanden's
t
# Hi list!
# I'm trying to learn how to write externals (after being able to link and
compile the source codes thanks to Yvan Vander Sanden's tutorial) and come
up with a strange behavoir: The object [additive~] turns into a messege box
[additive~( (and sometimes its borders are totally erased or
