If I type something like this in a messagebox:
list +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1
then should the +1 be floats or symbols?
(currently, they're symbols)
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelan
Dunno which is should be, but the 'c' language doesn't
allow unary '+' in front of numerical literals... so I
followed that lead.
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:05:09PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
> If I type something like this in a messagebox:
>
> list +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
Dunno which is should be, but the 'c' language doesn't
allow unary '+' in front of numerical literals... so I
followed that lead.
I don't know which C language you are talking about. Try compiling the
following program with options -ansi -pedantic-e
On Dec 28, 2006, at 12:03 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
Dunno which is should be, but the 'c' language doesn't
allow unary '+' in front of numerical literals... so I
followed that lead.
I don't know which C language you are talking about. Try compil
> > This demonstrates that unary + works in front of numerical literal,
> > both in the main language and in the preprocessor. I don't know of
> > a way to test whether the last + before the 1 is actually
> > considered part of the literal or not. However, both scanf() and
> > strtod() cons
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
My intuition says that +1 should be a symbol,
Intuition is something that is trained. If you trained that part of your
intuition using pd and not much else, you may get to see "+1 is a symbol"
as something normal, obvious, and the way it sho
