On 2010-03-31 09:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-03-31 02:33, Vilson Vieira wrote:
>> patch using pix_sig2pix, please, take a look [1].
>
> just in case: i really want to get rid of [pix_sig2pix].
> the name to use if [pix_sig2pix~] and nothing else.
... use is [pix_Äsig2pix~] (with a t
On 2010-03-31 02:33, Vilson Vieira wrote:
> patch using pix_sig2pix, please, take a look [1].
just in case: i really want to get rid of [pix_sig2pix].
the name to use if [pix_sig2pix~] and nothing else.
the same applies to [pix_pix2sig~].
the reason for the alias without "~" is really a technic
2010/3/30 servando barreiro
>
> HI Vilson, That video you posted seems like mixing a little bit of audio
> signal into the video and maybe viceversa... (analog glitch). Looks also
> like an analog video mixer w circuit bending.. http://vimeo.com/8913301
Yes! I'm in love with glitching :-)
HI Vilson, That video you posted seems like mixing a little bit of audio
signal into the video and maybe viceversa... (analog glitch). Looks also like
an analog video mixer w circuit bending.. http://vimeo.com/8913301
I did found a nice way of making glitches in pd http://vimeo.com/6932986
