[PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-10 Thread ild0012
i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array it heppends just even in the helppatch .. it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the valu

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-11 Thread Steffen
On 11/09/2007, at 8.41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > can anyone help, please . I don't fully understand your problem. Maybe a Pd patch that explains the problem could help me. Other then that, what's you platform (os, arch, pd version)? ___ PD-list@

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
the [tabread] object is certainly well tested and working almost everywhere, so if it is not working as expected it might be your platform (which you haven't mentioned) if you are using a 64bit-linux and a pd-version <0.41, consider an upgrade. however, i haven't tried to fully read your bug d

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-11 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected > it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the > elements of the array > > it heppends just even in the helppatch .. > > it actually gives not a z

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-14 Thread ild0012
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected > > it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the > > elements of the array

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-14 Thread Miller Puckette
You need version 0.41 (only out in a test version so far, but it seems quite stable at teh moment.) cheers Miller On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:32:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Hallo, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: //

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-14 Thread ild0012
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:32:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Hallo, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected > > > it just outputs to

Re: [PD] glitchy [tabread] or ..?

2007-09-14 Thread ild0012
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > You need version 0.41 (only out in a test version so far, but it seems > quite stable at teh moment.) > > cheers > Miller > right, i see .. diff m_pd.h shows stuff about garray and define x86_64 etc .. thanx. -- Ilya .D >