Re: [PD] initbang/closebang and $@ patch statuses

2010-06-20 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
The first is included in Pd-extended, the second could be if someone wants to refactor it so that the patch applies. I can't speak for what's in Miller's trunk. .hc On Jun 19, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Hi list, What's the story on the following patch? [initbang]/[cl

Re: [PD] initbang/closebang and $@ patch statuses

2010-06-19 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:  2009-03-14, quoting Miller: "Anyhow, I'm trying to think of a better mechanism for allowing abstractions to have variable numbers of inlets/outlets, so I'm hoping initbang won't be necessary in the long run." If he were really trying, he would hav

[PD] initbang/closebang and $@ patch statuses

2010-06-19 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Hi list, What's the story on the following patch? [initbang]/[closebang] for patch constructor/destuctor - ID: 1544041 I know it says the status is "open," but on the other hand this patch was added in 2006. From the related threads on pd user and dev, all I've seen are repeated hopes fr