is there any need for the 1ms metro limit? couldn't it at least be lowered
to 0.01ms to enable sample accurate timing?
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
i guess the limitation is for safety reasons.
but you can always use a self-feeding delay:
[toggle ]
|
[sel 01]
| \
[bang ( [stop (
\ /
[t b]X[del 0.0226757]
|
..
--
ypatios
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
[sel 01]
oops!
i mean [sel 10]
ciao
--
ypatios
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
yeah yeah, i know, so don't let it go to infinitely small values, but 1ms is
probably getting a bit outdated. surely it's time for a revision?
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
take a del and feeback the outletBang with the inlet of the del. do not
forget a stopmessage (caution infinite loop)
yours sincerely
der.brandt
is there any need for the 1ms metro limit? couldn't it at least be
lowered
to 0.01ms to enable sample accurate timing?
I do some sample accurate work, the best way I've found is [bang~] which
outputs a bang every every audio cycle.
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:26:40 +0100
From: bra...@subnet.at
To: hard@gmail.com
CC: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] metro limit
take a del and feeback the outletBang
i'm not looking for suggestions. i'm just saying that the 1ms lower limit
on metro speed is probably getting a bit outdated, and could be lowered to
0.01ms, to allow for sample accurate timing.
i assume that 1ms was an arbitrary decision made years ago when computers
were much less powerful, and
