hello,
...today i go back to an one-year-old-thread.
for some reasons, i had to go back to an old project and i remembered my problems i had
there, while installing pd-extended and vanilla beside of each other, for using
"pdsend" but still keeping the extended-version.
now,
one year later, i'
> please install "puredata", then manually uninstall "gem", then install
> pd-extended.
> should work.
>
hello IOhannes,
i tried now 2 different ways:
first: i installed puredata with "sudo aptitude install -R" so gem is not
installed with, automaticly (thats great!)
second: i installed pured
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pedro Lopes wrote:
>
> It doesn't make much sense in my head, if I do not need GEM I shouldn't be
> forced to install it. I can try installing GEM to see if then pd will not
> uninstall pd-extended.
you should exactly _not_ install gem (the "puredata
Works for me, for this release the conflict doesn't make sense. Its something
to reconsider once pd-extended is split into separate debiaqn packages.
.hc
"IOhannes m zmoelnig" wrote:
>On 2010-05-19 22:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> anyhow: now that pd-extended installs everything i
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 22 May 2010 00:34:27 +0100
> Von: Pedro Lopes
> An: IOhannes m zmoelnig
> CC: Hans-Christoph Steiner , pd-list@iem.at,
> queno...@gmx.de
> Betreff: Re: [PD] no pdsend on pdextended?
>
>
> Okay, after
Okay, after reading aptitude help a while, I tryed installing pd with
pd-extended already installed on Linux. It says extended will be removed due
to 1 conflict. When I expand the view it says its due to the unresolved
dependency GEM.
It doesn't make much sense in my head, if I do not need GEM I s
I never got use to aptitude, but I think "now's the time"... :)
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:39 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-05-20 14:30, Pedro Lopes wrote:
> > Im having a similar problem in my netbook, I have pd-extended installed
> from
> > a deb package and if I try:
> >
> > pe...@bi
On 2010-05-20 14:30, Pedro Lopes wrote:
> Im having a similar problem in my netbook, I have pd-extended installed from
> a deb package and if I try:
>
> pe...@bird-nb:~$ sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends puredata
then i would recommend everybody to use aptitude and check why the
packag
Im having a similar problem in my netbook, I have pd-extended installed from
a deb package and if I try:
pe...@bird-nb:~$ sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends puredata
I get him trying to remove pd-extended...
[sudo] password for pedro:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependen
On 2010-05-19 22:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> anyhow: now that pd-extended installs everything into
>> /usr/lib/pd-extended/extra/
>> i don't see any reason why it still conflicts with: pd-externals, gem,
>> pd-pdp, pd-zexy
>
> Well, the plan going forward is to split pd-extended into i
On 2010-05-19 22:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> On a related note:
>> Where do externals belong that are neither part of puredata nor
>> pd-extended?
>
> Check the FAQ for "how do I install externals?"
>
http://puredata.info/docs/faq
unfortunately there is only a faq "How do I install e
seems like my mail didn't make it...
i'll try again
On 2010-05-19 21:10, Christian Heck wrote:
>
> i tried this packages...:
>
[...]
>
> maybe it's really on me i'm quite new in linuxthis what i do
thanks for the detailed info.
> is:
> sudo dpkg -i Pd-0.42.5-extended-20100519-ubu
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:41 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> anyhow: now that pd-extended installs everything into
>> /usr/lib/pd-extended/extra/
>> i don't see any reason why it still conflicts with: pd-externals, gem,
>> pd-pdp, pd-zexy
>
> On a related note:
> Wher
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-05-18 18:08, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> You can now install both at the same time, so 'pdsend' and 'pdrecieve'
>> are in the puredata package. The new pd-extended package indeed
>> recommends you install the 'puredata' package.
>
> i guess this is only a
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:48:46 +0200
> Von: IOhannes m zmoelnig
> An: Christian Heck
> CC: pd-list@iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] no pdsend on pdextended?
>
>
> then it would be interesting to know which packa
On 2010-05-19 17:57, Christian Heck wrote:
>
>>
>> why do you download 15-may package today (19th may), if there are
>> nightly autobuilds, and chances are high, that the fixes have only been
>> added recently?
>> try a build from 19-may.
>>
>> fm
>> IOhannes
>>
>
> i tried the nightly auto build
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:46:36 +0200
> Von: IOhannes m zmoelnig
> An: Christian Heck
> CC: pd-list@iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] no pdsend on pdextended?
>
> On 2010-05-19 17:32, Christian Heck wrote:
> >
> &
On 2010-05-19 17:32, Christian Heck wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-19 09:38, JOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> which exact version of pd-extended?
>>
>
>> i think what hans said only applies to recent autobuilds (date matters!)
>>
>> i tried with the package found here
>>
>> http://autobuild.puredata.info
> On 2010-05-19 09:38, JOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> which exact version of pd-extended?
>
> i think what hans said only applies to recent autobuilds (date matters!)
>
> i tried with the package found here
>
> http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest/Pd-0.42.5-extended-debian-squeeze-i
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:41 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> anyhow: now that pd-extended installs everything into
> /usr/lib/pd-extended/extra/
> i don't see any reason why it still conflicts with: pd-externals, gem,
> pd-pdp, pd-zexy
On a related note:
Where do externals belong that are neit
On 2010-05-18 18:08, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> You can now install both at the same time, so 'pdsend' and 'pdrecieve'
> are in the puredata package. The new pd-extended package indeed
> recommends you install the 'puredata' package.
i guess this is only a temporary hack until the pd-util
On 2010-05-18 20:15, Christian Heck wrote:
> thank you,
>
> a 'bin' package (or something like this) for pdsend and -receive would be
> really cool!
interesting how exactly the same question (pdsend/pdreceive missing) was
raised not longer than one week ago on this list.
for what it is worth, a
the same, but i dont know how to make it
different?
christian -the lost
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:08:58 -0700
> Von: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> An: queno...@gmx.de
> CC: pd-list@iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] no pdsend on pdexten
You can now install both at the same time, so 'pdsend' and 'pdrecieve'
are in the puredata package. The new pd-extended package indeed
recommends you install the 'puredata' package.
For the next release, there will probably be a 'pd-bin' package or
something like that, separate from the
hi everyone,
i just tried to skript a patch out of my terminal
but
the answer is: i have to install vanilla to work with pdsend.
but i'd like to keep my extended version.
how can i get pdsend for extended?
thanks for help
christian
p.s. my pd 0.42.5.extended-20100504 is running on ubuntu kar
25 matches
Mail list logo
