Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-15 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 3:15 AM Subject: Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array) On Thu,

Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-06 Thread Ed Kelly
  We should use C language only when we need it, in the example of [waveinfo] vs [soundfile_info], both aren't the good way for me, we just need the [binfile] external for reading the header, and all the other stuff can be done into a pd patch. we don't need [binfile]! Pd is proven to be

Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-06 Thread Patrice Colet
De: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at On 10/04/2012 05:04 PM, Patrice Colet wrote: We should use C language only when we need it, in the example of [waveinfo] vs [soundfile_info], both aren't the good way for me, we just need the [binfile] external for reading the header, and all

Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 13:16 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: [...] Also, I wanted to know which is mature enough so that it's worth to write bug reports to its author. This consumes quite some time and I think everyone who discovers that there are many solutions for her problem needs to

Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-05 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 10/04/2012 05:04 PM, Patrice Colet wrote: We should use C language only when we need it, in the example of [waveinfo] vs [soundfile_info], both aren't the good way for me, we just need the [binfile] external for reading the header, and all the other stuff can be done into a pd patch.

[PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all The thread below makes me curious about what people think about the support of two or more several implementations of the similar functionality. There are a few such cases: * [ext13/wavinfo] vs. [iemlib/soundfile_info] * OSCx vs. mrpeach's osc library * arraysize vs.[expr

Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-04 Thread Patrice Colet
De: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com Hi all The thread below makes me curious about what people think about the support of two or more several implementations of the similar functionality. There are a few such cases: * [ext13/wavinfo] vs. [iemlib/soundfile_info] * OSCx vs.

Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)

2012-10-04 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2012 10:44 AM Subject: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array) Hi all The thread below makes