Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread danomatika
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 16:00 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Daniel Wilcox wrote: > > > > Sorry if this is a dumb question ... but why would you want to do this in > > PD, why not use a hardware solution as it would be much faster? Something > > like Cobranet, ie digital audio over Cat5: > >

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread Nicholas Mariette
Yes, try netsend~ and netreceive~, by Olaf Matthes. There's a recent update (with some fixes) available at: http://www.remu.fr/sound-delta/netsend~/?page_id=7 older version: http://www.nullmedium.de/dev/netsend~/ or in svn: http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/externals/o

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread Martin Peach
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Martin Peach wrote: Wolfgang Jäger wrote: Hello, For sending audio efficiently over OSC I would need an OSC-"BLOB". Unfortunately the packOSC object supports no OSC-"BLOB"s. Is there any possibility to send BLOBs? since blob is an arbitrary type, you have to interp

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Daniel Wilcox wrote: Sorry if this is a dumb question ... but why would you want to do this in PD, why not use a hardware solution as it would be much faster? Something like Cobranet, ie digital audio over Cat5: http://www.audioscience.com/internet/products/sound_cards/asi54xx.htm hmm, why

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread Daniel Wilcox
> iirc, for the very project the decoding is done outside of Pd anyhow (on > specialized hardware), so the problem of [unpackOSC] not knowing what to > do with a blob is a minor issue here. (and the use of specialized > hardware is the reason why data (low-resolution fixed-point numbers) > should a

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread Wolfgang Jäger
> iirc, for the very project the decoding is done outside of Pd anyhow (on > specialized hardware), so the problem of [unpackOSC] not knowing what to > do with a blob is a minor issue here. (and the use of specialized > hardware is the reason why data (low-resolution fixed-point numbers) > should a

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Martin Peach wrote: Wolfgang Jäger wrote: Hello, For sending audio efficiently over OSC I would need an OSC-"BLOB". Unfortunately the packOSC object supports no OSC-"BLOB"s. Is there any possibility to send BLOBs? since blob is an arbitrary type, you have to interpret/generate this list of b

Re: [PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-10 Thread Martin Peach
Wolfgang Jäger wrote: Hello, For sending audio efficiently over OSC I would need an OSC-"BLOB". Unfortunately the packOSC object supports no OSC-"BLOB"s. Is there any possibility to send BLOBs? ciao I can probably add a Blob type to [packOSC] and [unpackOSC]. The thing is that the blob type

[PD] packOSC "BLOB"

2009-05-10 Thread Wolfgang Jäger
Hello, For sending audio efficiently over OSC I would need an OSC-"BLOB". Unfortunately the packOSC object supports no OSC-"BLOB"s. Is there any possibility to send BLOBs? ciao Wolfgang ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-managemen