On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
marius schebella schrieb:
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every
other program on my computer?
Yes, I also don't understand this ...
Although there might be a workaround, newbies (and even me as not
so new
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:02:36 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That way you can turn it on only when you are performing,
for example. Then it would be useful.
Here's the nub of it. Performance vs programming. As someone else
who does both I can agree the feature is a
nothing is bad about using shift.
but the question is, how pd should behave if your are NOT using shift,
but click on the small X in the pd console window title bar (or a patch)
that usually closes a patch or program without confirmation. (unless you
haven't changed the document.)
new users may
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:02 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
marius schebella schrieb:
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every
other program on my computer?
--consistency. #1 rule for interface design... yea!
marius.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:02 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
marius schebella schrieb:
let
On 26/01/2008, at 12.22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not use Ctrl-Shift-w to close, and Ctrl-Shift-q?
Bliss. I had no idea of that feature. FAQ material IMHO.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
marius schebella schrieb:
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every
other program on my computer?
Yes, I also don't understand this ...
Although there might be a workaround, newbies (and even me as not so new
newbie) don't know this and are only irritated.
LG
Georg
Quoting marius schebella [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
let me ask the other way? why has pd to behave different than every
other program on my computer?
because if it was the same as any other program, one of them would be
redundant :-)
mfgasdr.
IOhannes
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
saved the patch or not.
i hope i'm not being intolerant.
thanks.
On 26/01/2008, naysayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
saved the patch or not.
I find
thats fine, i guess if everyone is happy with it, i'll get used to it.
cheers
On 1/26/08, Ypatios Grigoriadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/01/2008, naysayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm
no, I am not happy with it, either.
would it be possible to make this an option in the pd-settings.
pd-extended doesn't have this behaviour, at least not the old versions.
have not tested the latest.
marius.
naysayer wrote:
thats fine, i guess if everyone is happy with it, i'll get used to it.
On 26/01/2008, naysayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats fine, i guess if everyone is happy with it, i'll get used to it.
That's the spirit! :-)
ciao
P.S.: The lawyer in my brain insisted on me posting the following comment:
My being funny is absolutely 100% well- intended
--
Ypatios.
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing and opening patcher windows while
doing a live performance ?
I think your setup and/or patch should make that unnecessary (or
On 26/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing and opening patcher windows while
doing a live performance ?
I think
* Ypatios Grigoriadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-26 17:08]:
On 26/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing
marius schebella wrote:
no, I am not happy with it, either.
would it be possible to make this an option in the pd-settings.
i would be interested to know what keeps you from using the Ctrl-Shift
versions of the shortcuts if you don't want the annoying dialogs.
for me it seems, like asking for
17 matches
Mail list logo
