Re: [PD] pd-extended universal binaries?

2009-02-18 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Feb 18, 2009, at 2:27 PM, marius schebella wrote: > IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> marius schebella wrote: >>> http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest >>> the macos104-i386 and macos105-i386 should both be universal >>> binaries. >> >> they are not (esp. the app itself is not) - at l

Re: [PD] pd-extended universal binaries?

2009-02-18 Thread marius schebella
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > marius schebella wrote: >> http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest >> the macos104-i386 and macos105-i386 should both be universal binaries. > > they are not (esp. the app itself is not) - at least i cannot open it on > a ppc-G4, getting an error about unsupp

Re: [PD] pd-extended universal binaries?

2009-02-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
marius schebella wrote: http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest the macos104-i386 and macos105-i386 should both be universal binaries. they are not (esp. the app itself is not) - at least i cannot open it on a ppc-G4, getting an error about unsupported arch. fgasdfr IOhannes smime

Re: [PD] pd-extended universal binaries?

2009-02-18 Thread marius schebella
http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest the macos104-i386 and macos105-i386 should both be universal binaries. marius. IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > hi all. > > might seem stupid, but are there any universal binaries of a recent > Pd-extended (0.41) available? > i basically only need the

[PD] pd-extended universal binaries?

2009-02-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
hi all. might seem stupid, but are there any universal binaries of a recent Pd-extended (0.41) available? i basically only need the core-application (including the app-builder), no need for externals (i'll provide my own) fgmasdr IOhannes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatur