On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:38:46 -0500
Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:37:06AM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:27:32 -0500
> > Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Andy Farnell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500
> > >
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:37:06AM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:27:32 -0500
> Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andy Farnell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500
> > > Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, we're clear on that. I was responding
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:27:32 -0500
Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy Farnell wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500
> > Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
> >>
> >>> As I see, the unipolar
Andy Farnell wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500
> Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
>>
>>> As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there
>>> is a chemical reaction that removes
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500
Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
> > As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there
> > is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +, Andy Farnell wrote:
> As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there
> is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere,
> (and one assumes no matter is transformed to energy) - well NO2 and O3
> are prod
Yes. A rapid expansion and collapse of air pressure would most
definitely be inseparable causes.
~Kyle
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Andy Farnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yes. That's part of it.
>
> According to Ribner and Roys first paper the vacuum collapse model
> is refuted - we
Yes. That's part of it.
According to Ribner and Roys first paper the vacuum collapse model
is refuted - well, they don't use that exact word - more like
they suggest it is replaced...
"As recently as the late 1800's, four theories of thunder were in competition:
The vacuum collapse theory, the
* Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-05 23:33]:
>
>
> You're spot on there. I will develop the stereo image as I work on
> the environment model.
>
> But interestingly enough, lightning _is_ an explosion, one hell of
> a big explosion. The plasma is as hot as the Sun for an instant and
>
You're spot on there. I will develop the stereo image as I work on
the environment model.
But interestingly enough, lightning _is_ an explosion, one hell of
a big explosion. The plasma is as hot as the Sun for an instant and
that's why the air expands, the energy in a lightning bold makes most
b
Robert Henke (Monolake, Ableton) has a little Youtube video that talks
about simulating thunders with a delay matrix comprised of several
granular delays and an initial impulse. Here is the video. I don't
know more than that!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL4MMJMXEFk
~Kyle
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 a
just a suggestion:
i think the reason why they sound a bit like explosions, rather than
thunder, is because the cracks of thunder are propogated directly in
front of you. maybe some sort of spatialization could make the crack
appear more overhead, and then the rumble lower down?
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:01:59 -0500
marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi andy,
> the samples sound very complex already, how did you create them? I had
> more the impression of explosions, though, than thunder.
Yes, interesting feedback. Theres three models I've got atm. The Wright
M
hi andy,
the samples sound very complex already, how did you create them? I had
more the impression of explosions, though, than thunder.
regarding books, do you know if any of these books are available as pdfs
at all? otherwise do you want paper copies???
at least the second article is available
Any feedback appreciated (aesthetic criticism most welcome) on
some designs done in Pd.
http://www.obiwannabe.co.uk/sounds/effect-synthetic-thunder-21.mp3
http://www.obiwannabe.co.uk/sounds/effect-synthetic-thunder-34.mp3
http://www.obiwannabe.co.uk/sounds/effect-synthetic-thunder-57.mp3
If anyon
15 matches
Mail list logo
