If you need to send a 0 at the beginning of each block, here are some
interesting ways of doing it that just occurred to me:
__
[sig~ -1] [block ]
|
[rfft~]
|
[/~ ]
|
[+~ 1]
|
___
and the best:
___
[sig~
> hello
>
> im sorry i left the thread for some time now.
> thank you all very much for your replies.
>
> Your results are confirmed here too: the two methods with vsnapshot~ and
> writing-reading to a table are equally inefficient.
> Matt's suggestion --whilst much more efficient-- has a serious
hello
im sorry i left the thread for some time now.
thank you all very much for your replies.
Your results are confirmed here too: the two methods with vsnapshot~ and
writing-reading to a table are equally inefficient.
Matt's suggestion --whilst much more efficient-- has a serious disadvantage:
> Note that [metro] has a lower limit of 1 ms, so you need to make your own
> metro-abstraction.
Ah - I had no idea that this was true. I suggested using a metro with
a rate of 1/44.1 ms as an alternative to [block~ 1], but I guess
there's no way around it...
It seems like the best thing to hav
>
> As I understand it (and hopefully i am not completely wrong..) you don't
> have to 'store' a list and 'then' read again it to find the max magnitude.
> It's as simple as the following:
>
> (some signal)
> *I*
> *I* [pd me...@samplerate]
> *I*/
> [vsnapshot~ ]
> |
> [abs ]
> |
> [moses ]X[t f ]
Hallo,
ypatios hat gesagt: // ypatios wrote:
> As I understand it (and hopefully i am not completely wrong..) you don't
> have to 'store' a list and 'then' read again it to find the max magnitude.
> It's as simple as the following:
>
> (some signal)
> *I*
> *I* [pd me...@samplerate]
Note that [m
On 2010-02-09 11:21, ypatios wrote:
> Hallo Frank :-), thanks for your reply
>
> (i updated the subject since the discussion moved on..)
>
> While you could bang vsnapshot~ at samplerate and keep track of samples in a
>> list or so, this is a waste of resources. Something like tabsend~ or
>> tabw
Hallo Frank :-), thanks for your reply
(i updated the subject since the discussion moved on..)
While you could bang vsnapshot~ at samplerate and keep track of samples in a
> list or so, this is a waste of resources. Something like tabsend~ or
> tabwrite~
> probably is much better: Just write a nu
