Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 18:30 +0100, João Pais wrote: > Hi, > > another chapter in this: I just tried out the same patch, using now > [metro] instead of Lyon's objects. The problem is that the results are > still quite simliar, i.e. I still get clicks (almost) every 125ms (the > beat duration), resu

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-26 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:38:06AM +0100, João Pais wrote: >>> and here a link to a thread with iohannes and lyon: >>> http://markmail.org/message/7usetdchjlqyk3eu#query:+page:1+mid:7usetdchjlqyk3eu+state:results >> >> Actually it's Frank and Eric. :) The thread still sums up what's important

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-25 Thread João Pais
and here a link to a thread with iohannes and lyon: http://markmail.org/message/7usetdchjlqyk3eu#query:+page:1+mid:7usetdchjlqyk3eu+state:results Actually it's Frank and Eric. :) The thread still sums up what's important here: It's not necessary to use Eric's objects in Pd. They may be useful

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-25 Thread João Pais
Hi Claude, so you're saying that vline~ "or other clock-aware objects" [which, btw?] is precise in itself, so the problem should come from E Lyon's objects, which aren't, because of sig->mess conversion? (which is funny, because apparently they were made to correct this, at least in max/msp

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-25 Thread Frank Barknecht
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:56:11AM +0100, João Pais wrote: >> Ah, and I see in addition to your message you wrote vline~ in the >> title! Oops. >> >> I don't know what click2bang~ does-- is it aligning its bangs to block >> boundaries? That's just a guess. > > better to leave it to the author t

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-25 Thread João Pais
rg/message/7usetdchjlqyk3eu#query:+page:1+mid:7usetdchjlqyk3eu+state:results João -Jonathan From: João Pais To: PD-List ; Jonathan Wilkes Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 6:53 PM Subject: Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging Hmm, I have to correct yo

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-24 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
than Wilkes >Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 6:53 PM >Subject: Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging > >Hmm, I have to correct your message to get a more interesting answer from you >:) > >the SR is 48K, and I'm using vline~ already. Theoretically with E Lyon

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-24 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 24/01/12 21:50, João Pais wrote: > maybe the messaging isn't precisely aligned with the audio. For this patch I'm using E Lyon's samm~ and click2bang~ I'm not familiar with those externals, nor in inspecting the output of a patch (which is on the large size) instead of the patch. But some

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-24 Thread João Pais
esumably at a higher CPU cost). -Jonathan From: João Pais To: PD-List Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:50 PM Subject: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging Hi, please look at the attached audio file. It's a recording of a sinus tone stored

Re: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging

2012-01-24 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
k, thus giving you higher precision (presumably at a higher CPU cost). -Jonathan > > From: João Pais >To: PD-List >Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:50 PM >Subject: [PD] precision of vline~ and/or pd messaging > > >Hi, > >please