Hi there,
yeah, the way it was, I didn't see a way to not use [bang~], so I asked to
see if there was something new for me. But then I just started working with
buffers that are multiples of block size, which is fine. Check the Phase
Vocoder harmonizer I shared over here. I made it that way.
And
Hi Alex
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 16:33 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Hi folks, I'm trying to implement a ring buffer with a table for a sampler
> patch based on an array.
>
> But I'm having the hardest time cause it always "clicks" when I start
> writing back on the beginning of the array.
Well, this is for the phase vocoder patch, which is based on miller's I07
example.
There's a counter that reads over the table, and I expanded the thing
allowing it to loop and other convenient sampling controls.
I never needed a perfect loop, cause I never loaded real perfectly looped
files in i
On 1/8/12, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Hi folks, I'm trying to implement a ring buffer with a table for a sampler
> patch based on an array.
>
> But I'm having the hardest time cause it always "clicks" when I start
> writing back on the beginning of the array.
>
> I made this simple test atta
I know, I thought of that, but then, I need to make the table always as big
as a multiple of an audio block, right?
I was hoping to have a way without this restrain. But maybe it isn't that
much of a big deal.
2012/1/8 tim vets
>
>
> 2012/1/8 Alexandre Torres Porres
>
>>
>> Hi folks, I'm tryi
2012/1/8 Alexandre Torres Porres
>
> Hi folks, I'm trying to implement a ring buffer with a table for a sampler
> patch based on an array.
>
> But I'm having the hardest time cause it always "clicks" when I start
> writing back on the beginning of the array.
>
> I made this simple test attached b
Hi folks, I'm trying to implement a ring buffer with a table for a sampler
patch based on an array.
But I'm having the hardest time cause it always "clicks" when I start
writing back on the beginning of the array.
I made this simple test attached below using metro. But I'm figuring the
flaw is be