Roman Haefeli wrote:
inlet: expected 'signal' but got 'list'
the statement, that it expected 'signal' is false, because it obviously
also accepts floats.
but then i find it easier to find a conversion from a single number
(float) into a fixed sized number-list (signal) than a
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
[list(
|
[print]
(no method for 'bang')
I don't have a clear idea of which is right, but I do think that they
should give the same error.
Personally I would prefer it if [print] was less keen on trying to be
Hallo,
Patrice Colet hat gesagt: // Patrice Colet wrote:
Hello, I've updated on some computer pd-0.37 to 0.40, and passed a lot
of time to find out an error caused by [select], attached is the mistake
I've found out in my old, huge, and ugly patch.
With simple words, could you people
Frank Barknecht a écrit :
Hallo,
You can only sent a float to the right inlet of a [select] initialized
in float-mode ([select]s, that don't have a symbol as argument, are in
float-mode).
Then I guess this feature came out with versions 0.37
Sending a bang into the second inlet instead
On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Patrice Colet hat gesagt: // Patrice Colet wrote:
Hello, I've updated on some computer pd-0.37 to 0.40, and passed
a lot
of time to find out an error caused by [select], attached is the
mistake
I've found out in my old,
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I admit that it's a bit strange, that a naked bang message gives a
different error message (no method for bang) than a bang sent
through [t a] (no method for
On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
I admit that it's a bit strange, that a naked bang message gives a
different error message (no method for bang)
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:19 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If [list( is equal to [bang( then it always needs to be equal
to [bang(. Right now, it is only sometimes equal to [bang(
have you already tried this:
[list(
|
[print]
pd-window says: 'print: bang' . i admit, i didn't know
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:19 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Try defining the current behavior, then I think it's more clearly a
bug. An empty [list( is a bang unless you are sending to the right
inlet of some objects, like [select].
oops, i should have read further. i think, i
Supposedly, list and bang are identical. I think the right way to
print an empty list is to print bang. But then again, if you're asked
what the selector is, I suppose it could be legitimately described as
either 'list' or 'bang' - each carries a risk of confusion.
cheers
Miller
On Thu, Sep
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:19 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On
It's a bug in the error message, at the very least. This stuff needs
to be consistent, otherwise it makes it hard to understand and
debug. If [list( is equal to [bang( then it always needs to be equal
to [bang(.
This is definitely a thing that can cause confusion, that's why I
think it should be consistent throughout. So one of these is
probably wrong:
[list(
|
[select]
(no method for 'list')
[list(
|
[print]
(no method for 'bang')
I don't have a clear idea of which is right,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Roman Haefeli wrote:
have you already tried this:
[list(
|
[print]
pd-window says: 'print: bang' . i admit, i didn't know that before, but
it seems somehow consistent, that an empty list is equal to 'bang'. do
you know a case, where it is handled differently?
GridFlow
13 matches
Mail list logo
