On 14 sept. 09, at 11:41, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Loic,
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see
[mux~] in your patch already...
you are probably looking at my patch (with [mux~]) rather than
loic's patch (without it)
The problem with as
Ah yes, ooops! Another reason to write things in plain text, attachments
can be problematic ;-)
D.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see [mux~]
in your patch already...
you are probably looking at my patch (with [mux~]) rather than loic
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Loic,
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see [mux~]
in your patch already...
you are probably looking at my patch (with [mux~]) rather than loic's
patch (without it)
The problem with asking "which Pd object is
like this Max object?" is that
Hi Loic,
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see [mux~]
in your patch already... The problem with asking "which Pd object is
like this Max object?" is that many of us have never used Max. If you
could describe in plain text what the function you want is, maybe we can
h
Loic Kessous wrote:
Hi,
I didn't found an equivalent to max external "selector~" , I made this
ugly abstraction for 3 inputs but I wonder if there is something more
standard and that can accept argument to set the number of inputs.
is there one?
I used 'mixer~' which is ggee to do it, so th
Loic Kessous a écrit :
Hi,
I didn't found an equivalent to max external "selector~" , I made this
ugly abstraction for 3 inputs but I wonder if there is something more
standard and that can accept argument to set the number of inputs.
is there one?
not in vanilla.
i made a smaller abstract
Hi,
I didn't found an equivalent to max external "selector~" , I made this
ugly abstraction for 3 inputs but I wonder if there is something more
standard and that can accept argument to set the number of inputs.
is there one?
I used 'mixer~' which is ggee to do it, so there maybe some way