Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> after a closer look to list-abs again, it turned out that almost all of
> the vector-abs are already implemented in list-abs and therefore could
> be considered obsolet. the only really new is [v_rotate] (it's _not_ the
> same as list-rot)
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:10 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > hi all
> >
> > during my trials with gem i made a little set of abstractions, that
> > hopefully could be usefull when dealing with vectors. at least they have
> > been for me.
> >
> > the set contains:
> >
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:53 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> >
> > why don't you just make them part of the frank's list-abstractions?
>
> Because they already are? ;)
>
> But the versions of these in [list]-abs also han
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> why don't you just make them part of the frank's list-abstractions?
Because they already are? ;)
But the versions of these in [list]-abs also handle arbitrary length
lists and lists including symbols (which get ignored).
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> hi all
>
> during my trials with gem i made a little set of abstractions, that
> hopefully could be usefull when dealing with vectors. at least they have
> been for me.
>
> the set contains:
>
> [v_+] : adds two vectors
> [v_-] : subtracts a vector from
How convenient to be having linear algebra AND complex math in the
same week! (Now for how they are related...)
More like this, please!!!
~Kyle
On 2/28/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all
>
> during my trials with gem i made a little set of abstractions, that
> hopefully could
hi all
during my trials with gem i made a little set of abstractions, that
hopefully could be usefull when dealing with vectors. at least they have
been for me.
the set contains:
[v_+] : adds two vectors
[v_-] : subtracts a vector from another
[v_scale] : scales a vecto
