hola,
sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject,
but what is the status now of pd
on a 64 bits architecture?
more precisely, on an intel core duo?
which version needed?
thanks,
sevy
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and acco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> hola,
>
> sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject,
> but what is the status now of pd
> on a 64 bits architecture?
> more precisely, on an intel core duo?
>
> which version needed?
pd-0.41 (his is: the current CVS), seems to work fine on my amd64 (t
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:36 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hola,
sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject,
but what is the status now of pd
on a 64 bits architecture?
more precisely, on an intel core duo?
which version needed?
pd-0.41 (his is: the cur
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
A bit off-topic: what's the cheapest AMD64 that you can get? Are the
original generation good chips?
Huh, what happened with subsequent generations?
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:
> >pd-0.41 (his is: the current CVS), seems to work fine on my amd64 (the
> >only problems i had with earlier versions were the tables)
it was freezing on launch here until start with -noaudio, then i realize the
configure.in generates a script that still doesn't properly detect jack..
manually
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, carmen wrote:
sure. but theyre single core (the dual core boost is probably 95% more
performance, compared to maybe 20% for just the 64bit part)
But if you're going to run pd on this, the second CPU is only for the GUI,
unless you use threaded externals. Right? So, what k
On 13 Dec 2006, at 4:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject,
but what is the status now of pd
on a 64 bits architecture?
more precisely, on an intel core duo
It was my first excursion into Linux so not realising the problems
(then lack of ti
