If anyone's curious, I managed to compile dssi~ myself with only a
minor headache and am now up and running with LADSPA effects in OS X
intel.
After futzing with plugin~ and vst~ (which I now know doesn't work yet
in os x), I'd definitely recommend that people take a look at dssi~ if
they're hopi
dssi~ definitely works on OS X for both LADSPA and DSSI plugins. The
official release can be found at:
http://www.puredata.org/Members/jb/dssi%7E/view
There is a dependency on the liblo library. You will also need the
LADSPA and DSSI SDK's if you want to compile from source. Let me know if
you ha
both tgrill's vst~ and plugin~ should work on OSX with trivial
modifications. i suggest you just try compiling them, after
collecting the requisite SDKs.
I'm sorry, that's not true for vst~. It doesn't currently work for
OSX, since the windowing functions haven't been implemented yet.
gr
Exactly the same as what I was getting. See
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-01/046124.html
Kevin
On 2/4/07, David NG McCallum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should also say that when I try to compile plugin~ I get the following
error (that I saw mentioned on the list earlier, an
Should also say that when I try to compile plugin~ I get the following
error (that I saw mentioned on the list earlier, and the only solution
I could find anyone give was to find a binary of plugin~ somewhere,
which isn't that helpful):
gcc -dynamiclib -o plugin~.pd_linux jload.os jsearch.os plug
Yeah, I just found out that plugin~ is included in pd-extended, but I
can't seem to get it to recognise any of the ladspa plugins I have on
my machine, and whenever I try to load the plugin~ help patch, my
machine just crashes… sigh.
D
On 04/02/07, Kevin McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Plugin~
Plugin~ compiles (Hans has it doing it somehow, I couldn't get it to work)
but it doesn't actually work for me, just causes Pd to crash. Also, the
difference between OS X vsts and Win32 vsts is a factor here, from what I
understand. So unfortunately I don't think Mac OS X is doing too well right
On Sat Feb 03, 2007 at 10:11:34PM -0500, David NG McCallum wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that there was some activity going on at some point with using
> VST plugins in Pd, and I got the impression that there were several
> unrelated objects, or legacy objects, and I was never really sure
> which th
Hi all,
I know that there was some activity going on at some point with using
VST plugins in Pd, and I got the impression that there were several
unrelated objects, or legacy objects, and I was never really sure
which the "current" VST object was for Pd (plugin~? vst~?). So…
Is it currently poss