> To be honest, I don't think the non classic mode is that much
> sensible. It'd make much more sense to me to specify a power
> exponential.
I take this back, because that what it does after all, you specify the
power exponential :)
I still think we need to clone the classic mode behavior, but I
> There's no way mapping 13.3 from 0-127 to -1 to 1
> should result in something so close to -1
well, there wouldn't be a way if it were a linear scaling... but it's a
logarithmic scale, so it'll do what it does.
> Just try a few different exponents and
> you'll see that there's a bug in the Max
Well, I'm trying to point out that it ain't "broken", the object works...
whatever its code is. I'm just trying to figure out the code to clone it.
2015-06-19 22:55 GMT-03:00 Joel Matthys :
> I just don't see the value of trying to make it compatible with broken
> code in Max.
>
> Joel
>
>
> On
I just don't see the value of trying to make it compatible with broken
code in Max.
Joel
On 06/19/2015 08:47 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
yeah, I see all that, but the problem is trying to clone it as it is
in Max for the sake of compatibility.
I wouldn't say that the classic mode is "
yeah, I see all that, but the problem is trying to clone it as it is in Max
for the sake of compatibility.
I wouldn't say that the classic mode is "wrong", it may be not good for the
purpose, but it's an arbitrary mathematical formula, so it is what it is.
The problem is that I'm not being able t
You're using the [scale] formula from @classic_mode in Max7, which
exists for compatibility with IRCAM, but it's clearly wrong. (There's no
way mapping 13.3 from 0-127 to -1 to 1 should result in something so
close to -1. Just try a few different exponents and you'll see that
there's a bug in t
This is coming up on my first year
as a PD hacker.
Having so much fun.
I think I'm obsessed.
One thing I am really digging about PD is that after 1 year,
I feel I have a basic grasp of about 20% of the PD objects
(i think I am including extended here)
and maybe 60% of the paradigm.
* Even with
Hi Alexandre,
> it almost is, but in maxlib you just turn the mapping to log on or
off, in max you specify a log parameter.
That is a very handy feature!
> by the way, I'm pretty sure I'm not doing anything wrong, and the
given equation in Max just seems to be wrong
Yep, just double checke
> the object you describe sounds to me identical to [maxlib/scale]
it almost is, but in maxlib you just turn the mapping to log on or off, in
max you specify a log parameter.
I did share a patch in text and attached. Not sure if everyone gets the
attachment so I sent the text file as well, but he
Hi Alexandre,
On 20/06/15 00:39, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:
Here's my patch with that formula into expr. The output with the parameters
I have should be -0.997347 - as that's the output I get in Max. But
instead, it's giving -0.994694...
Would you care to share your parameters so we c
Howdy, so I'm cloning the scale object from Max, to make an object and
include in the cyclone library. It converts range input (low_in / high_in)
to a range output (low_out / high_out). It has a logarithmic curve for
rescaling according to a fifth argument/inlet. I did copy into expr the
formula de
On 06/19/2015 02:11 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 06/19/2015 04:33 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Hi,
This is likely because you are using a newer version of the wiimote that
has motionplus embedded and the supporting libcwiid library wiimote object
relies on does not support that version. For the
On 06/19/2015 04:33 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is likely because you are using a newer version of the wiimote that
> has motionplus embedded and the supporting libcwiid library wiimote object
> relies on does not support that version. For the time being your only
> choice is to use old
> It could be my limited knowledge of how to handle real library objects.
Now that you've mentioned, that seems about right :) I know nothing about
how to handle it too, but I believe it'd be quite trivial to load them
without declaring it like that. And there'd be no need to split them into
many
> But please do not work on cyclone and
> break the Max/MSP compatibility.
Howdy... Of course! Agreed! But not sure about the purpose of this remark
considering what was being discussed with [rampsmooth~] and all - it was
for the sake of compatibility. We're actually being very strict to make it
e
About maintaining cyclone, I think a reorg would be great, and further
maintenance as well. If you want to do whatever you want with it, then just
make a fork and work on it as a new
name. If you want to stick to cyclone's central goal of Max/MSP
compatibility, then keep working on it as cyclone
Hi,
This is likely because you are using a newer version of the wiimote that
has motionplus embedded and the supporting libcwiid library wiimote object
relies on does not support that version. For the time being your only
choice is to use older version of the wiimote. HTH
Best,
Ico
On Jun 19, 20
hi all,
this is my first post here, so please give me feedback, if you need more
information. so here's my issue:
i'm trying to connect my wii motionplus with the wiimote object. after
pressing 1 and 2 and sending the message "connect B8:AE:6E:55:35:2B"
(this is the mac-adress, which i found
Dear all,
Sorry I forgot to reply. Thank you all for your inputs. I've learned
something.
@IOhannes : I've used an array instead as suggested.
Cheers,
Pierre.
2015-06-10 17:15 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
> On 06/02/2015 11:10 PM, Pierre Massat wrote:
> > PS : I've been using the new text an
"Could you please describe what you understand by this leap?"
Still 1st impression - not read the article properly yet.
It seems to be proposing a complete reversal of most things I've been
taught in the study of electronic music. That as far as the computers
concerned data is data - all noise. I
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 17:41 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> > You are sure you don't want to upgrade? :-).
>
>
> not to extended 43, thanks ;)
Not that it matters much after all, but I'm still curious: What is worse
in Pd-extended 0.43 than 0.42?
Roman
___
21 matches
Mail list logo
