On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 18:40 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Well, I'm pretty sure that neither wish85 nor Pd will run without at least
> the dlls shipped in pd/bin. I'm at a loss to figure out for sure what other
> DLLs must be present as well. It looks like I'd better install a pristine
> Window
Well, I'm pretty sure that neither wish85 nor Pd will run without at least
the dlls shipped in pd/bin. I'm at a loss to figure out for sure what other
DLLs must be present as well. It looks like I'd better install a pristine
Windows XP myself - I've asked at school if they have one handy, otherwi
>
>
> IESHIMS.DLL
> WER.DLL
>
Hi, many messages through the web about Dependency Walker are reporting
that these can be safely ignored (and some other always flagged as missing,
regardless of tested binary)
Cheers
Nicolas
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailin
On Don, 2015-06-25 at 07:54 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I'm not sure, but I think that's not a problem... I dound something about
> that here:
>
> http://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html
>
> (third question in the FAQ).
>
> But meanwhile, is it still the case that wish85.exe can't run on
> What do you want me to check?
I was just more curious to see if you understood the similarities between
comb~ and teeth~ since it seemed you were still in doubt on how it behaved.
Did you see that comb~ has also two delay lines?
> If comb~ and teeth~ are so close, one
> wonders why there are t
I'm not sure, but I think that's not a problem... I dound something about
that here:
http://www.dependencywalker.com/faq.html
(third question in the FAQ).
But meanwhile, is it still the case that wish85.exe can't run on a pristine
windows XP machine??? There must be something else not happeni
Yep, cheers Pall
On 24 June 2015 at 16:04, Pall Thayer wrote:
> Julian, it sounds like you're looking at the debugger in the browser. Look
> at the console and use the console.log() function to give you a better idea
> of what's going on.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:35 AM s p wrote:
>
>> No w
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 21:56 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I take it you have some way to un-install the "MSVC 2008 Redistributable
> Package" so that you were able to get the new test version of Pd to fail to
> run... if so can you repeat Roman's experiment, launch wish85.exe on the
> command l
Hi Alexandre,
What do you want me to check?
If comb~ and teeth~ are so close, one wonders why there are two objects
at all. In hindsight, the early development of objects in Max/MSP
doesn't look very organized. Almost like the pd-extended collection :-).
Greetings,
Fred Jan
On 2015-06-25 12:20
