Has anyone made Systems Dynamics abstractions for Pure Data?
Wikipedia has a good article on Systems dynamics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_dynamics
I would like to create a simple stock and flow modeling environment.
Stock and flow models can be as simple as predator/prey population
Hmm ... actually I got carried away. I can't implement [cos~] or [env~]
with native web audio API nodes.
I'll have to use a slow ScriptProcessorNode. So if performance is not a
concern for you I'll do it, but I won't integrate it to the core of WebPd.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Julian
Thanks Iohannes,
will give a try, but anyway it already happened not the first time to me.
Last time I had 3 identical mac minis with the same system image on each. 2
could run the script without problem, but the 3rd did not. The problem is
especially with GEM, as in this case I have double
I'll have to use a slow ScriptProcessorNode.
Here's to hoping for Audio Worker Nodes aye :(
Out of curiosity how are the native nodes different from using the
ScriptProcessorNode? For something simple like abs~ or wrap~ is
performance *that
*drastically worse?
On 26 August 2015 at 09:53,
On 2015-08-26 10:25, s p wrote:
Hmm ... actually I got carried away. I can't implement [cos~] or [env~]
with native web audio API nodes.
I'll have to use a slow ScriptProcessorNode. So if performance is not a
concern for you I'll do it, but I won't integrate it to the core of WebPd.
since
Hi Seb,
Thanks for having a go.
While absolutely agreeing with IOhannes, is it the same situation with
[abs~] and [wrap~]?
Regards,
Julian]
On 26 August 2015 at 09:36, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote:
On 2015-08-26 10:25, s p wrote:
Hmm ... actually I got carried away. I can't
On 2015-08-26 06:25, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Yes, you can get 'correct' execution order by just
adding your objects in the right order.
what is the right order then?
it's undefined.
(conceptually) it's the very same as using a fan-out without [trigger]:
if you are lucky (or know the
Thanks for the info Seb - will do.
On 26 August 2015 at 11:52, s p seb...@gmail.com wrote:
since it's really easy to build [cos~] with writing [cos] values to a
table¹, wouldn't it make sense to add [cos] and [until] to the WebPd core?
@IOhannes yes that's an option. Unfortunately, table
Alright! I've added [until], [cos], [sin], [tan], [atan], [log], [exp],
[sqrt], [abs] to WebPd.
Please tell me if you have any problem!
Also please share your experiments when you're done ;)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Julian Brooks jbee...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the info Seb - will
