Re: [PD] Looking for some advice

2015-09-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
sorry to hijack the thread, but a parallel question here, what are the libraries already available in the deken plugin? I know of cyclone only. cheers 2015-09-12 21:19 GMT-03:00 Mike McGonagle : > I've recently learned that Pd extended is pretty much no longer being > "extended", and as such, I'd

Re: [PD] [PD-dev] Looking for some advice

2015-09-12 Thread Miller Puckette
How I do it: unarchive any recent version of Pd overwrite the source with whatever version you want (for instance, you can clone the git repo) into Pd-xxx/Contents/Resources cd to Pd-xxx/Contents/Resources/src and hit "JACK=true make -f makefile.mac" (or if you want 64-bit-ness:) JACK=true ma

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

2015-09-12 Thread Miller Puckette
Yep, that sounds like the correct way to interpret it. I've attempted a fix, now up on git repo. Thanks again for flagging this M On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:18:31PM -0400, Matt Barber wrote: > Thanks again. Can you confirm that a range with onset greater than n-1 > should be empty, and not a ra

[PD] Looking for some advice

2015-09-12 Thread Mike McGonagle
I've recently learned that Pd extended is pretty much no longer being "extended", and as such, I'd like to learn how to compile Pd Vanilla along with the few externals I need. I'm currently using Mac OS X 10.6.8 and have tried using the standard "autogen/configure/make", but it seems to stop when t

Re: [PD] unexpected [array max] and [array min] behavior

2015-09-12 Thread Matt Barber
Thanks again. Can you confirm that a range with onset greater than n-1 should be empty, and not a range with just the (n-1) item? I'm building some abstractions with these, and I want range behavior to be consistent with those in the [array] objects. Thanks! M On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Mi

Re: [PD] A patch to create a patch to create a patch to create a patch to close puredata...

2015-09-12 Thread Matt Barber
I don't think so, unless someone else presented them. I've never been able to afford the time or money to get to a PdConv. Also I didn't think many people would find them that interesting until now. :) Nice work yourself. M On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Olivier Baudu <01iv...@labomedia.net> w

Re: [PD] A patch to create a patch to create a patch to create a patch to close puredata...

2015-09-12 Thread Olivier Baudu
Masterpieces !! :-D Are those patchs the ones Benjamin was talking about few answers before ? (He saw them at the PdConv in Montreal) I take this opportunity to post my last work : https://vimeo.com/139090261 Cheers °1 Le 12/09/2015 07:13, Matt Barber a écrit : > Jonathan Wilkes and I made t

[PD] sampstoms~ (was Re: weird behavior of [vd~] in phave vocoder (overlapping subpatches))

2015-09-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
one thing related to what was discussed on that thread. [cyclone/sampstoms~] and [cyclone/mstosamps~] will convert between ms and samples account for the oversampling of the overlaps in block so it'll consider [block~ 2048 4] to have 4x the sample rate of what pd is running. This actually works

Re: [PD] weird behavior of [vd~] in phave vocoder (overlapping subpatches)

2015-09-12 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
> But [vd~] itself does nothing regarding to overlap and that's > very important to understand. It just behaves like [tabread4~]. I still like considering vd~ special, but I totally see and understand what you mean ;) > I think this is just an issue of proper documentation! Agreed, we should ask

Re: [PD] mailing list digest question

2015-09-12 Thread Philip Stone
Well, if a feature exists, it ought to be implemented logically. If digest mode is such a problem, maybe it shouldn’t be an option. But if it does, it should probably work better. > On Sep 11, 2015, at 9:19 PM, Max wrote: > > IMHO the digest mode creates more issues then it solves. Because d

Re: [PD] mailing list digest question

2015-09-12 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 09/12/2015 06:19 AM, Max wrote: > A better solution to fix the cluttered inbox problem it to a) use a > dedicated email account for lists, or/and b) use message filters in your > mail client to move list mails to their own folder, so they don't bother > you in your general inbox at all. persona