[PD] Is Cyclone forking? What's the current version and official goal? Who's the "owner"? How can I collaborate?

Howdy, I'm interested in collaborating to cyclone by coding and inserting new cloned objects. This makes me ask a few questions, but first, here's a little history/research about cyclone. = Cyclone history so far: Original project is authored by K. Czaja (copy of original project

[PD] opensoundcontrol.org

Does anyone know who runs opensoundcontrol.org ? It’s down and has been down for a few weeks now. Did CNMAT forget to pay the bill? Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com

[PD] libpd: How to buffer processFloat/processDouble calls?

How should processFloat/processDouble calls be buffered. If I’m getting input (and require output) at some nFrames chunks and libpd’s blocksize is 64, then how should I handle it so that input/output occurs in sync and without gaps. I see there’s a ring buffer implementation in the lib: https:/

[PD] libpd: Can you adjust Pd's block size?

Can you adjust Pd’s block size, which is claimed to be 64 by default? How’s one supposed to do e.g. FFT processing in 64 sample blocks? https://github.com/libpd/libpd/wiki/libpd#audio-processing-with-pd — I’m using the C++ he

[PD] libpd: Does libpd use voice allocation / how does libpd handle polyphony?

Do I need to do something in order to have libpd support polyphony or can I merely send all notes to PdBase::sendNoteOn and it will also handle chords? — I’m using the C++ headers. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-managemen

Re: [PD] Burst of packets.

On 18/02/16 07:33, Chris McCormick wrote: On 18/02/16 05:07, Mario Mey wrote: A buddy from a group suggested me to send "bursts of packets" instead only one packet... considering this packet as important. If you need guaranteed, ordered delivery from one machine to another then you should use

Re: [PD] Burst of packets.

Hi Mario, On 18/02/16 05:07, Mario Mey wrote: A buddy from a group suggested me to send "bursts of packets" instead only one packet... considering this packet as important. If you need guaranteed, ordered delivery from one machine to another then you should use TCP sockets instead of UDP sock

[PD] Burst of packets.

Hi, there. I'm working with MobMuPlat in Android and PureData in Linux. I use my MEH-SYSTEM (*1) and I'm having issues with packets loss. A buddy from a group suggested me to send "bursts of packets" instead only one packet... considering this packet as important. So, I imagine, if I send 10 m

[PD] Not accepting new objects in Cyclone, why not? (was Re: Nettles)

2016-02-17 16:33 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan : > Hi Alexandre, > >> >> You may have noticed a pull request already for [pong]. I'm working with >> someone else and we should be having scale / scale~ / atodb / dbtoa / >> atodb~ / dbtoa~ / trunc~ ready quite soon! >> > > Yes, I noticed. I appreciate al

Re: [PD] Nettles. Was: Cyclone: List of Issues with existing objects by Alexandre Porres

Dear Fred, some of the objects proposed by Porres could be added in cyclone? If yes, we can work on them; otherwise I see your todo list[1]. If you confirm this list probably it's better to work to fix bugs. Cheers, Marco Matteo Markidis [1]: http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/digaud/puredata/cyclon

Re: [PD] Nettles. Was: Cyclone: List of Issues with existing objects by Alexandre Porres

Hi Alexandre, Howdy, if you understand only a part of it, I know that I know about nothing. But hey, as I understand it, there's quite some work to make it (loading the weird name objects without [declare]) happen and you'd rather focus on other fixes, cool. Well, I'm just starting using githu

Re: [PD] Does Pd have a "sound"?

:) > and finally : > ok, sorry, i'll stop trolling that thread. > > cheers > c No troll at all! Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com ___ Pd-l

Re: [PD] pianoroll [was: Re: datastructures midirecorder]

This ought to be easier now with the new text object as well as the new list functions On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: > > > De: "Billy Stiltner" > > > > > > > Patrice Colet, that proll.tcl is somethin else. I had no idea that > > such a thing is possible. > > I think > >

Re: [PD] pd-0.46-7: segfault with jack-1.9.10

Actually, rather than figure out git bisect (warning: it opens a new branch and after you're done you have to manually get rid of it and get back to 'master') - since there are only 4 commits in question you could simply check out each of the 4 and see which is the first one that gives you the cras

Re: [PD] readanysf~ for windows ? (another try ...)

Le 16/02/2016 22:48, oliver a écrit : patrice colet wrote: By the way, the dll you have should work when you provide all missing libraries in bin folder. unfortunately it doesn't. If libs you have to put in bin dir aren't compatible with the ones provided by pd-extended, it might

Re: [PD] Does Pd have a "sound"?

sounds good to me! Thanks Miller and other coders for all your hard work! It works pretty good I must say. https://archive.org/details/ziggettezaggerzdragondraggers ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://list

Re: [PD] pd-0.46-7: segfault with jack-1.9.10

IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : On 2016-02-17 09:11, Xavier Miller wrote: I have diffed the jack related source between 0.45-5 and 0.46-0. I see added test on null pointers, but I have questions about a for loop mixed with this test, or the fact that some actions are still done where there

Re: [PD] Does Pd have a "sound"?

Le 17/02/2016 09:15, Matt Barber a écrit : They won't sound bad, necessarily; they just won't sound band limited. (Everything has its place.) I think you just found the definitive answer on the question "does XXX sound better than YYY" : nothing sound bad, everything has it's place. the ans

Re: [PD] pd-0.46-7: segfault with jack-1.9.10

On 2016-02-17 09:11, Xavier Miller wrote: > I have diffed the jack related source between 0.45-5 and 0.46-0. > > I see added test on null pointers, but I have questions about a for loop > mixed with this test, or the fact that some actions are still done where > there are null buffers. > > I wi

Re: [PD] Does Pd have a "sound"?

They won't sound bad, necessarily; they just won't sound band limited. (Everything has its place.) On Feb 16, 2016 1:29 PM, "cyrille henry" wrote: > if you want to compare the "sound" of SC and pd, please use band limited > operator, or both will sound bad. > > cheers > c > > > Le 16/02/2016 19:1

Re: [PD] pd-0.46-7: segfault with jack-1.9.10

Hi!, I have diffed the jack related source between 0.45-5 and 0.46-0. I see added test on null pointers, but I have questions about a for loop mixed with this test, or the fact that some actions are still done where there are null buffers. I will check every block later, and find the prob