Do you want to share your patch? I could test it on my machine with 0.46 and
0.47
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26 Juni 2016 um 13:27:23 Uhr
Von: "Dario Sanfilippo"
An: pd-list
Betreff: [PD] Experiencing a higher CPU load with 0.47-0 and 0.47-1.
Hi, list.
I'm loading the
hello,
how are you doing cpu load measurement?
I find it very hard to do reliable measurement of cpu load nowadays, since
computer have a variable cpu speed depending on load.
For exemple, pd CPU load can be at 75%, with CPU frequency at 800MHz. When
increasing the patch complexities, the CPU
Hi, Christof.
It is a rather large project and relatively new, so I'd prefer not to share
it at this point as it still kind of a work in progress. I will try putting
together some test patches isolating some of the most used objects and see
if there's any significant change in the different PD ver
hello,
i'm sorry to jump again on this kind of topic, but it's painful to read a mail
like that.
Le 26/06/2016 23:31, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
2016-06-26 16:35 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>>:
for me this sounds a bit like "i'd love to see them as external
Le 27/06/2016 11:58, Dario Sanfilippo a écrit :
Hi, Christof.
It is a rather large project and relatively new, so I'd prefer not to share it
at this point as it still kind of a work in progress. I will try putting
together some test patches isolating some of the most used objects and see if
Yeah, most of your points against externals sounds a bit like "they need to
be maintained and that takes effort", I know... but I don't think that's a
disadvantage of an external. If no one is willing to do it, that's another
problem...
> OK,sometimes, externals can be faster. And in sometimes, it
2016-06-27 12:41 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
> From reading the email, seems there are attempts to solve many of the
> issues like right clicking and getting into a properties window, which I
> think it's impressive and I'd like to see that as I still cannot quite
> grasp how it'd be possi
Yes, the whole thing is baffling, but I gather something changed from 0.46
to 0.47 ... I've gt a coupld of benchmark patches I can try to see if I can
see what's going on.
cheers
Miller
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14:56PM +0200, cyrille henry wrote:
>
>
> Le 27/06/2016 11:58, Dario Sanfilippo a
Hello,
I think this discussion is moving to a general debate... or a troll :-(
about external vs. abstraction
Anyway, I'm interested in this not-so-childish debate, even if I might not
have the skills to give some arguments (like on performance), and that I
think it's more a personal matter at the
2016-06-27 18:08 GMT-03:00 Raphaël Ilias :
> I think this discussion is moving to a general debate... or a troll :-(
> about external vs. abstraction
> Anyway, I'm interested in this not-so-childish debate, even if I might not
> have the skills to give some arguments (like on performance), and tha
I agree with Alexander.
Also Ivica has pointed the use of array as a multislider, I attach an example
on that. Very easy and useful.
Also I consider “multislider” a missing object or a bug in “zexy” not in
cyclone. :)
Salutti,Lucarda.
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
From: por...@gmail
2016-06-27 19:41 GMT-03:00 Lucas Cordiviola :
> Also I consider “multislider” a missing object or a bug in “zexy” not in
> cyclone. :)
>
the one in max would be quite a pain to clone, I have to say :P that's why
I first let it open to "some library", you know... just a basic
multislider. And Pd-L
12 matches
Mail list logo
