On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 09:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2017-01-15 22:58, Miller Puckette wrote:
> >
> > I can't understand what is wrong... if you 'stop' a line~ and then
> > later
> > give it a new target, it ramps form the position it had stoped
> > at. I think
> > this is the most
On 2017-01-15 22:58, Miller Puckette wrote:
> I can't understand what is wrong... if you 'stop' a line~ and then later
> give it a new target, it ramps form the position it had stoped at. I think
> this is the most reasonable behavior. Or is it doing something different
> somehow?
it starts from
