Re: [PD] pd opens patch twice from script

Dan, unfortunately, both extended and newest vanilla behaves the same way on sierra. Will try the method you linked above and let the list know. Best, Popesz On Wednesday, March 29, 2017, Dan Wilcox wrote: > The patch window state is being saved and re-opened when Pd is

[PD] accoustic guitar chord detection

howdy, getting involved in a research that needs to detect notes from guitar chords (no hex pickup solutions, unfortunately). No need to do anything fancy with the spectra, or process it in any way like with celemony melodyne's DNA stuff. Do any of you know of some nice stuff done in Pd or Max or

Re: [PD] pd opens patch twice from script

The patch window state is being saved and re-opened when Pd is being restarted. See http://puredata.info/docs/faq/help-pd-crashes-on-startup-on-mac-osx-10-7 Newer versions of vanilla have a fix that disables state saving

[PD] Running Pd with real-time priority

When running Pd, it is supposed to run with real-time priority by default, right? When launching Pd from the terminal, you usually get this printed: priority 6 scheduling enabled. priority 8 scheduling enabled. I'm running Pd on an Odroid-U3, and launching Pd from the terminal doesn't print

[PD] pd opens patch twice from script

Dear list, I want to create an automatic control of a patch which can freeze. The first patch send every x seconds a signal via osc to an other patch. If the first patch does not respond after x+n seconds the first the second patch runs a shell script to killall pd instances than run a shell

[PD] PdParty 1.0.3

Howdy all, PdParty 1.0.3 is out on the Apple App Store. It’s a small release which adds full MIDI message handling so realtime and clock messages work. Tests with MIDI hardware and sequencers have been exciting. http://danomatika.com/code/pdparty Also,

Re: [PD] oops (did a bad thing in puredata.info)

2017-03-28 5:02 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig : > another example is the "purr-data" [2] project, which uses github as a > distribution mechanism; albert just created a dummy release that will > show upfront and which points to github). I hadn't figured that out at first, but I

Re: [PD] [text define] functionality for text in structs?

> Actually I haven't had a whole lot of issues with traversing data > structures yet, but that's probably because I haven't dealt with > gigantic lists of scalars yet. I have - and traversing large lists of scalars by pointer can be vry slow. > possible/worthwhile? I suppose maybe the

Re: [PD] [text define] functionality for text in structs?

Miller Puckette writes: > There ought to be a way to do this - some other object than [text define] > should be able to do 'read' and 'write' operations. Perhaps this needs > to be added to the [pointer] object somehow. (For a long time I've wished > for a better suite of

Re: [PD] oops (did a bad thing in puredata.info)

On 27/03/2017 21:40, zmoel...@iem.at wrote: On 03/27/2017 05:45 PM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: A while ago I managed to break the page: https://puredata.info/downloads/granita-minimalist-granular-synthesis [...] Any idea on how to constructively fix it would be appreciated... i've deleted

Re: [PD] oops (did a bad thing in puredata.info)

On 2017-03-28 02:22, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Me too, I'm all up for keeping the history, but this would make sense if we > were to keep using that page as a release source. As it is, there's a > conflict, either we have the cake or we eat it. i don't see your point. the current way of