Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Alexander Connor
I think the most probable reason active sense is being ignored in the latest version of PD is because I reported this bug (and other midi issues) after fielding and confirming multiple problem reports on the PD web forum: https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2017-01/020888.html I agree

[PD] MARG (Was: Sensors2OSC mapping challenge)

2017-08-20 Thread Max
Attached is the C code from the paper linked below. Before I try, should I attempt to make this in Pd as an abstraction or just take this c code and see if I can turn it into an external? Or maybe someone has already done it? On 2017년 07월 27일 09:17, katja wrote: Hi Max, To emulate 3D orient

Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Dan Wilcox
I have full MIDI parsing in a couple projects including PdParty. I could look into it at some point... > On Aug 20, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > I thoguht adding "FE" would be so simple that even a guy like me could do a > Pull Request for it... but no :/ > > 2017-08-2

Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
I thoguht adding "FE" would be so simple that even a guy like me could do a Pull Request for it... but no :/ 2017-08-20 12:23 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres : > i guess it's that if you're dealing with raw MIDI, it could be annoying to > filter out those messages, who knows? Well, Miller proba

Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
i guess it's that if you're dealing with raw MIDI, it could be annoying to filter out those messages, who knows? Well, Miller probably does know why :) 2017-08-20 6:52 GMT-03:00 Dan Wilcox : > Good to know. As Pd dates from the late 90s, that might hit have been the > case originally... > > enohp

Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Dan Wilcox
Good to know. As Pd dates from the late 90s, that might hit have been the case originally... enohp ym morf tnes --- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Aug 20, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Ingo wrote: > > Active Sensing comes in about 3 times per second with a single byte. > Nothing

Re: [PD] Data in audio / modem

2017-08-20 Thread hans w. koch
how about encoding it normalized to 0. - 1.as amplitude in 3 sinewaves, about 1 octave (or better some non-harmonic spacing) apart and then separating the sinewaves with sigmund or fft? probably depends on how much precision you need to have. cheers hans > Am 20.08.2017 um 09:59 schrieb cyrille

Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Ingo
Active Sensing comes in about 3 times per second with a single byte. Nothing to worry about ... Pd has no problem handling 600 or more note, CC and pitchbend messages per second in my project. I'm seeing no problems whith 2 MIDI ins sending each 600 messages (total of 1.200 per second) - without l

Re: [PD] Data in audio / modem

2017-08-20 Thread cyrille henry
Le 19/08/2017 à 23:18, Max a écrit : On 2017년 08월 19일 23:03, cyrille henry wrote: If I'd would want to encode (sensor) data in an audio signal, how would I go about that? if the sensor output analog value, i'll just use 2 AOP : 1st one to create saw waveform and the 2nd one as a comparator

Re: [PD] conflicting block~ objects in same page

2017-08-20 Thread Jean-Marie Adrien
yep ! thanks a lot jm > Le 19 août 2017 à 22:33, zmoel...@iem.at a écrit : > > > Quoting Jean-Marie Adrien : > >> Hello >> Got this error message >> "conflicting block~ objects in same page » >> … not very explicit though since i must be using block~ objects without even >> knowing it >> "find

Re: [PD] Midi Real Time Active Sensing Message Ignored

2017-08-20 Thread Dan Wilcox
I think the reason realtime messages are ignored when receiving is that, by their nature, there are *a lot* of them and they come *really quickly*. Based Pd's architecture, I can imagine a flood of realtime messages might make the GUI unresponsive, so they are left off. I might be wrong on this.